Skip to main content

Artemisia Gentileschi, 'Jael and Sisera', c.1620

 



My eye firstly notices the hand wielding the hammer above the unsuspecting man's head. Gentileschi is depicting a new and particularly horrible kind of weapon here instead of the huge sword she gave Judith to slice Holofernes' head off in 1620. The tent peg seems all the more violent, especially as the viewer is looking at the split second before the deed has been committed. Moreover, the gaze of the women (Jael) is focused and calm, making the piece seem unnerving. This is not a moment of hesitation but a snapshot of action - the woman has made up her mind and will commit to this murder. The viewer can only imagine how Gentileschi would have depicted the bloody aftermath, in her usual violent and tenebristic way. The fact that the artist has signed her name in the tomb-like stone above the man is significant - she is signing his life away in this painting, sending him swiftly to the grave. 

The body of the man (Sisera) is also interestingly depicted. He lies in a rather effeminate way, resting his head on his arm in relaxation and deep sleep. The positioning of his legs with the rumpled drapery around them could almost be those of a woman and although Gentileschi has represented his sword in the foreground, we do not need that symbolism to see him as unmanned and emasculated. The way that he is tucked up close to the woman suggests a loving relationship, or an almost mother and son bond which is again brutally at odds with the subject. The two bodies make a right angle, again linking to what seems like a balanced and harmonious relationship. He even seems to have a slight smile on his lips, perhaps suggesting that he is in the midst of a good dream. This is all subverted by the unusual violence of the woman above him. Gentileschi has positioned the woman physically above Sisera, highlighting her dominance in the pictorial space and her power over him. The Caravaggio-like chiaroscuro is also lighting up Jael, so that the viewer focuses on her before they see the sleeping man below her. Gentileschi wants the viewer to focus on the woman, and see her strength, not just in the determination of her action but in her muscled forearms and dynamic, curving pose. The characteristic yellow of Jael's dress further emphasises her to the viewer, and emphasises her power in this composition. 

Typical of the time and of much of Gentileschi's other work, the two figures fill the space and there is little room to add anymore detail. The sudden contrasts and changes in colour, such as the virtually black background to the sudden paleness of the woman's skin, also conform to seventeenth century painting techniques. Even tiny details such as the folds of material suggest movement, as Jael creases her dress to kneel beside her victim, and the sash around her neck falls slightly off her shoulder as she precisely places the tent peg on the man's neck. The details are emphasised by the strong lighting which also pushes the figures forward in contrast to the shadows behind. Gentileschi's naturalistic details make her art seem all the more solidly real. But despite the colour and movement it is the calmness of the painting which heightens its unnerving quality. It is even more unnerving once you are standing opposite it. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Mark Rothko, 'Light Red over Black', 1957

  My eye is not drawn to the painting itself but the title of the painting, 'Light Red Over Black'. We would automatically think that the black is on top of a red background, but Rothko has flipped this around, subverting the title just like he subverting the meaning of what it was to be an artist and what Art actually was. During this time, art was going through rapid changes, with abstract expressionism coming into full force (Rothko, Pollock). But Rothko showed that all this change was for the good, even if for him, it was short lived.  The colour red in this painting is searing and the black struggles to fully cover this velvety border, especially at the bottom of the canvas. Unlike the black squares which have a hazy quality to their edges, the red is clear and impregnable. It is hard to figure out what this represents - the Tate has suggested a window perhaps, but if it is a window then what are we looking out into? Perhaps it is night, or perhaps the viewer is catching ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Egon Schiele, 'Dead Mother', 1910

  My eye is drawn to the hand. Those long, bony fingers are so characteristic of Schiele but here they are particularly skeletal and deathly – the veins seem to have been injected with poison. And they are a warning right in the foreground of the painting that keeps the viewer at bay as an outsider to this incredibly intimate relationship between mother and child, and sets the tone of death and mortality which hangs over the whole image. The mother cradles her child in a womb-like shroud, alluding to childbirth and the death of the mother explained in the title. She seems desperate to feel that bodily connection with her child, highlighted by the emphasis on her craned neck as she tries to connect to the baby. There is a clear link between the mother’s bent neck and the child’s bent neck, again emphasising their longing to be with each other. However, the darkness around the child is almost like ropes, with flecks of white in the painting making it look as though the darkness is wo...
Post a Comment
Read more

M.K. Ciurlionis, 'Funeral Symphony VII', 1903

  There are many who have been left out of the art historical canon and Lithuanian artist and composer Mikalojus Ciurlionis is one of them. Producing over 200 musical works and 300 paintings, his career was extensive, prolific and multifaceted. Yet, he was a 'genius cursed by fate' according to artist and critic Alexandre Benois, dying from exhaustion in 1911. Praised within his lifetime, Ciurlionis is virtually invisible today, especially to a Western viewer. Describing one artwork by Ciurlionis is not enough to appreciate his diversity and synthesis of artforms - pastels, as this work shows, vignettes, oils, designs for stained glass, even abandoning the easel for cardboard. More importantly, he was indebted to the Lithuanian landscape. Ichiro Kato refers to him as 'Lithuanian in nature and national feeling...a genius from the Baltic lands', reflected in works including  Serenity depicting idyllic, peaceful settings of mountains and lakes, devoid of humanity. Like man...
Post a Comment
Read more