Skip to main content

Artemisia Gentileschi, 'Jael and Sisera', c.1620

 



My eye firstly notices the hand wielding the hammer above the unsuspecting man's head. Gentileschi is depicting a new and particularly horrible kind of weapon here instead of the huge sword she gave Judith to slice Holofernes' head off in 1620. The tent peg seems all the more violent, especially as the viewer is looking at the split second before the deed has been committed. Moreover, the gaze of the women (Jael) is focused and calm, making the piece seem unnerving. This is not a moment of hesitation but a snapshot of action - the woman has made up her mind and will commit to this murder. The viewer can only imagine how Gentileschi would have depicted the bloody aftermath, in her usual violent and tenebristic way. The fact that the artist has signed her name in the tomb-like stone above the man is significant - she is signing his life away in this painting, sending him swiftly to the grave. 

The body of the man (Sisera) is also interestingly depicted. He lies in a rather effeminate way, resting his head on his arm in relaxation and deep sleep. The positioning of his legs with the rumpled drapery around them could almost be those of a woman and although Gentileschi has represented his sword in the foreground, we do not need that symbolism to see him as unmanned and emasculated. The way that he is tucked up close to the woman suggests a loving relationship, or an almost mother and son bond which is again brutally at odds with the subject. The two bodies make a right angle, again linking to what seems like a balanced and harmonious relationship. He even seems to have a slight smile on his lips, perhaps suggesting that he is in the midst of a good dream. This is all subverted by the unusual violence of the woman above him. Gentileschi has positioned the woman physically above Sisera, highlighting her dominance in the pictorial space and her power over him. The Caravaggio-like chiaroscuro is also lighting up Jael, so that the viewer focuses on her before they see the sleeping man below her. Gentileschi wants the viewer to focus on the woman, and see her strength, not just in the determination of her action but in her muscled forearms and dynamic, curving pose. The characteristic yellow of Jael's dress further emphasises her to the viewer, and emphasises her power in this composition. 

Typical of the time and of much of Gentileschi's other work, the two figures fill the space and there is little room to add anymore detail. The sudden contrasts and changes in colour, such as the virtually black background to the sudden paleness of the woman's skin, also conform to seventeenth century painting techniques. Even tiny details such as the folds of material suggest movement, as Jael creases her dress to kneel beside her victim, and the sash around her neck falls slightly off her shoulder as she precisely places the tent peg on the man's neck. The details are emphasised by the strong lighting which also pushes the figures forward in contrast to the shadows behind. Gentileschi's naturalistic details make her art seem all the more solidly real. But despite the colour and movement it is the calmness of the painting which heightens its unnerving quality. It is even more unnerving once you are standing opposite it. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

John Everett Millais, 'Peace Concluded', 1856

  My eye is drawn to the copy of The Times clutched in the hands of the officer. The white of the figurine on the man's knee and the white of his wife's sleeves all serve to make the white paper stand out even more on the canvas. As the title of the painting suggests, this is about the end of the Crimean War, seemingly depicting a soldier who has just returned home, surrounded by his family, but the mood is perhaps less euphoric than you might expect. The soldier seems somber and weary, and his wife has a look of concern. Although on the surface it seems to be quite a harmonious composition representing a close knit and traditional family, the positioning of the man is odd. It is his wife who takes her place at the apex of the triangular composition, the soldier is reduced to an emasculated role, perhaps an invalid, as suggested by the blanket over his legs. Her face is passive, but not exactly positive. With her arms draped around her husband, she looks posed, dutiful but not...

Ernst Barlach, 'The Avenger', 1914

  On the advent of both the First World War and the artistic movement known as Futurism, Ersnt Barlach cast this work in bronze. The eye picks out an angular, horizontal form, a sense of hurried pace and strong facial features to this work by the German Expressionist artist. This piece is highly interesting when discussed in terms of the artist's oeuvre - Barlach entered the First World War with a clear attitude of patriotism. The sculpture reflects that, as the figure seemingly thrusts forward wielding a sizeable weapon above his head, leading the charge head on. Describing the sculpture as his 'raging Barbarian' it is clear that Barlach wanted to present an emotionally charged figure. Perhaps it is even a self portrait, with Barlach picturing himself as the hero. The artist did in fact serve briefly as an infantry officer. However realisation soon dawned and patriotism quickly dwindled. All of Barlach's sculptures from this point onward are influenced by the horror an...

Mark Rothko, 'Light Red over Black', 1957

  My eye is not drawn to the painting itself but the title of the painting, 'Light Red Over Black'. We would automatically think that the black is on top of a red background, but Rothko has flipped this around, subverting the title just like he subverting the meaning of what it was to be an artist and what Art actually was. During this time, art was going through rapid changes, with abstract expressionism coming into full force (Rothko, Pollock). But Rothko showed that all this change was for the good, even if for him, it was short lived.  The colour red in this painting is searing and the black struggles to fully cover this velvety border, especially at the bottom of the canvas. Unlike the black squares which have a hazy quality to their edges, the red is clear and impregnable. It is hard to figure out what this represents - the Tate has suggested a window perhaps, but if it is a window then what are we looking out into? Perhaps it is night, or perhaps the viewer is catching ...