Burne Jones, 'The Beguiling of Merlin', 1872-7

Edward Burne-Jones - The beguiling of Merlin

My eye is drawn to the pair of eyes in the painting that belong to Merlin. His gaze is one of obsession, and the viewer knows he is instantly drawn to the woman that stands before him, but also of despair. The tilt of his head coupled with the slumped position of his whole body emphasises his complete enthrallment and ultimately his beguiling. Perhaps he is even trying to reach out one of his hands to touch her, but she is constantly moving out of his grip, shown by her contrapposto stance. His eyes are white, further suggesting some enchantment or spell has been cast upon him, to lure him in. The way the artist has shaded the eyes with a darker colour around the white emphasises his unblinking stare, reinforced by the deep line of furrow on his brow. As a painting, this is a snapshot in time and those eyes of Merlin will never be shut. For the rest of time he will be constantly staring at the person who is just out of his reach.

As a Pre-Raphaelite painting, this piece is rich with symbolism. Surrounding the two figures and engulfing the rest of the pictorial space is nature, particularly the hawthorn bushes that Merlin lies within. Hawthorn is associated with witchcraft, its innocent white flowers hiding vicious thorns and it is surrounding Merlin in a circular motion, literally trapping him in a deceptively soft yet dangerous embrace. There is no sky, no depth, no space: the branches form a Gothic arch above the figures in a parody of a church. The iris in the foreground of the painting has a variety of meanings, from faith and hope to a connection with heaven. Merlin's hand is reaching towards it but he has not the strength to grasp it and the iris stands forlorn, hardly even real without a reflection in the pool beneath.

Burne-Jones has drawn the folds in the clothing of Merlin and Nimue not with extreme care and delicacy. It adds to the sense of the wind blowing through the canvas and ruffling the woman's draperies. This also links to the way she is standing, her whole body tilted towards Merlin, but yet she is walking away. She has all the movement and power which he lacks, which she has taken from him. She is strong and vertical, he is slumping down to a horizontal. But then you come back to the eyes and realise there is still some strength left.

Comments

Cellini, 'Perseus with the Head of Medusa', 1545-1554

My eye is immediately drawn to the head of Medusa. At first glance it looks gruesome, as though Cellini has captured the moment just after the head has been decapitated, and it oozes blood and bodily matter. However the viewer then notices the similarity between that and Medusa's hair. Maybe it is just her hair after all. Cellini has cleverly enticed the viewer in here, to take a closer look and therefore involved them in the sculpture as a whole. Once they do come closer, they begin to notice other things such as the similarity between Perseus' hair and Medusa's snakes. Hero and monster are not so separate. Even the features of their faces are very similar. Perhaps Cellini wants to suggest that evil can often wear the mask of good. Or he could even be implying that everyone has some evil within them, even the hero Perseus. One of the good things about sculpture is that the viewer is able to walk around it, and fully immerse themselves in the piece. Cellini has used this...

Artemisia Gentileschi, 'Jael and Sisera', c.1620

My eye firstly notices the hand wielding the hammer above the unsuspecting man's head. Gentileschi is depicting a new and particularly horrible kind of weapon here instead of the huge sword she gave Judith to slice Holofernes' head off in 1620. The tent peg seems all the more violent, especially as the viewer is looking at the split second before the deed has been committed. Moreover, the gaze of the women (Jael) is focused and calm, making the piece seem unnerving. This is not a moment of hesitation but a snapshot of action - the woman has made up her mind and will commit to this murder. The viewer can only imagine how Gentileschi would have depicted the bloody aftermath, in her usual violent and tenebristic way. The fact that the artist has signed her name in the tomb-like stone above the man is significant - she is signing his life away in this painting, sending him swiftly to the grave. The body of the man (Sisera) is also interestingly depicted. He lies in a rather eff...

Guccio di Mannaia, 'Chalice for Pope Nicholas IV', 13th century

As the only work remaining of Sienese goldsmith Guccio di Mannaia, the chalice he created for Pope Nicholas IV in the late thirteenth century is an incredibly important work of art. Not only does it highlight the rich, opulent nature of papal commissions, but it proves the talent of Sienese goldsmiths and their resulting influence on painters and sculptors of the period. The chalice is innovative in shape and form, but it is striking first and foremost through the use of gold. It is an object that deserves to be viewed in the flesh, because of its reflective and therefore mimetic potential – like a bronze sculpture it is activated by light and should be experienced in the round as a three-dimensional, highly decorated art object. Its complicated design features an almost architectonic base, star-like as it spills out towards the viewer. The base builds up into the stem of the chalice which is decorated with an array of enamelled plaques featuring saints, prophets, angels and furt...

Art and Eye

Search This Blog