Burne Jones, 'The Beguiling of Merlin', 1872-7

Edward Burne-Jones - The beguiling of Merlin

My eye are drawn to the pair of eyes in the painting that belong to Merlin. His gaze is one of obsession, and the viewer knows he is instantly drawn to the woman that stands before him, but also of despair. The tilt of his head coupled with the slumped position of his whole body emphasises his complete enthrallment and ultimately his beguiling. Perhaps he is even trying to reach out one of his hands to touch her, but she is constantly moving out of his grip, shown by her contrapposto stance. His eyes are white, further suggesting some enchantment or spell has been cast upon him, to lure him in. The way the artist has shaded the eyes with a darker colour around the white emphasises his unblinking stare, reinforced by the deep line of furrow on his brow. As a painting, this is a snapshot in time and those eyes of Merlin will never be shut. For the rest of time he will be constantly staring at the person who is just out of his reach.

As a Pre-Raphaelite painting, this piece is rich with symbolism. Surrounding the two figures and engulfing the rest of the pictorial space is nature, particularly the hawthorn bushes that Merlin lies within. Hawthorn is associated with witchcraft, its innocent white flowers hiding vicious thorns and it is surrounding Merlin in a circular motion, literally trapping him in a deceptively soft yet dangerous embrace. There is no sky, no depth, no space: the branches form a Gothic arch above the figures in a parody of a church. The iris in the foreground of the painting has a variety of meanings, from faith and hope to a connection with heaven. Merlin's hand is reaching towards it but he has not the strength to grasp it and the iris stands forlorn, hardly even real without a reflection in the pool beneath.

Burne-Jones has drawn the folds in the clothing of Merlin and Nimue not with extreme care and delicacy. It adds to the sense of the wind blowing through the canvas and ruffling the woman's draperies. This also links to the way she is standing, her whole body tilted towards Merlin, but yet she is walking away. She has all the movement and power which he lacks, which she has taken from him. She is strong and vertical, he is slumping down to a horizontal. But then you come back to the eyes and realise there is still some strength left.

Comments

Nicola Pisano, 'Adoration of the Magi', Pisa Baptistery Pulpit Panel

In this complex, lively, exciting pulpit panel the eye looks up towards the monumentality of the Virgin, who commands this scene. She is massive and powerful, the largest figure with thick swathes of drapery delineating her forcefully protruding knees out into the viewer's space. Seated but still retaining dominance, she defines the classicising style of Nicola Pisano, witnessed throughout the panels of his pulpit in Pisa. Many writers have described the style - Eloise Angiola for instance, refers to the 'sophisticated understanding of classical prototypes to create heroic human forms' in Nicola's pulpit. Certainly in Pisa the prominent debris from the classical past remained visible and Nicola easily had access to various ancient sarcophagi for direct emulation here. The Virgin's features with her serene expression and curled hair beneath the mantle are in fact quite androgenous. She quickly assumes the position of a monumental Roman Emperor or Senator commanding

Marianne von Werekin, 'Sunrise', 1920

An endless line of men that tug the rope of a small boat soon disappear into murky, burning red waters beyond. Colour is fantastical, mystical and otherworldly, producing an atmosphere far from reality. This is the Symbolist work of Marianne von Werefkin, part of the German Expressionists that worked in Munich from the 1910s. A movement so often dominated by the male names of the time – Kandinsky especially – Werefkin was a vital participant, expanding the range of art produced and displayed, complementing her work with art theory and written sources, as well as creating her own Salon upon her arrival in Munich. It is easy to get lost in biography with a piece such as this. Wasted, human potential seems to be at the heart of this work, signalled by the endless line of men pushing forward towards the edge of the picture plane. There is a sense of struggle and a universality to the suffering through the portrayal of faceless men in similar blue tones. Looking at the date produced of 19

Mark Rothko, 'Light Red over Black', 1957

My eye is not drawn to the painting itself but the title of the painting, 'Light Red Over Black'. We would automatically think that the black is on top of a red background, but Rothko has flipped this around, subverting the title just like he subverting the meaning of what it was to be an artist and what Art actually was. During this time, art was going through rapid changes, with abstract expressionism coming into full force (Rothko, Pollock). But Rothko showed that all this change was for the good, even if for him, it was short lived. The colour red in this painting is searing and the black struggles to fully cover this velvety border, especially at the bottom of the canvas. Unlike the black squares which have a hazy quality to their edges, the red is clear and impregnable. It is hard to figure out what this represents - the Tate has suggested a window perhaps, but if it is a window then what are we looking out into? Perhaps it is night, or perhaps the viewer is catching a

Art and Eye

Search This Blog