Skip to main content

Renoir, 'At the Theatre', 1876-7

 Pierre-Auguste Renoir | At the Theatre (La Première Sortie ...

My eye is drawn into the painting by the profile of the girl and then through her gaze back out of the frame towards the unseen stage. The lightness of her flesh, the black point of her eye, which seems the most sharply drawn part of the painting, and above all the curving gilt frame behind her all focus our attention on her expression. She is leaning slightly forward, out of the seclusion of the box she sits in. Her lips are slightly parted and her face is hard to read, which emphasises the ambiguity of the piece in general. We do not know what has got her so captivated, but we too are mesmerised, not by the stage but by her features in desperation as we try to read her. Meanwhile, the quick Impressionist brushstrokes that make up the left of the painting mean that the viewer cannot connect with anyone else in the painting. It is almost as if the woman in the foreground will at any moment turn to us and ask ‘did you see that?'

Thanks to Renoir’s composition, the viewer is effectively sitting in the theatre too, crammed into the seat next to the girl, who they can see clearly, and other woman behind who is mostly obscured from view. There is a sense that the scene curves round, as the blurred figures of the background recede in size, but at a first glance the painting actually looks quite flat, the picture surface emphasised and bisected by the strong curving vertical and the horizontal on the left. These, both behind the girl, and the size of the foreground figures are what push them towards us and bring us into the painting.

There is a middle class refinement about it – this is a smart, fashionable theatre, not like one of Sickert’s music hall scenes – and Renoir emphasised this with the colouration. The violet-blue of the girl’s outfit is mirrored in the woman behind and repeated throughout the canvas, suggesting both the suits of the gentlemen and the understated elegance of the women. But there is also a depth and softness: the girl’s bonnet in particular seems to be made up of layers and layers of colour, and the blue tones are warmed with the inclusion of pinks and lilacs. The freshness and softness of the palette suggests her youth and the fact that this is her first outing to the theatre; even her skin has pigments of blue in it, giving it a translucent quality. The almost halo-like effect of the gold partition behind gives her a ‘gilded youth’ quality, safely enclosed but able to see the world. Her rapt stillness contrasts with the restless movement of the rest of the audience for whom this is a regular pastime and Renoir has enable us to share her excitement and wonder.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Nicola Pisano, 'Adoration of the Magi', Pisa Baptistery Pulpit Panel

  In this complex, lively, exciting pulpit panel the eye looks up towards the monumentality of the Virgin, who commands this scene. She is massive and powerful, the largest figure with thick swathes of drapery delineating her forcefully protruding knees out into the viewer's space. Seated but still retaining dominance, she defines the classicising style of Nicola Pisano, witnessed throughout the panels of his pulpit in Pisa. Many writers have described the style - Eloise Angiola for instance, refers to the 'sophisticated understanding of classical prototypes to create heroic human forms' in Nicola's pulpit. Certainly in Pisa the prominent debris from the classical past remained visible and Nicola easily had access to various ancient sarcophagi for direct emulation here. The Virgin's features with her serene expression and curled hair beneath the mantle are in fact quite androgenous. She quickly assumes the position of a monumental Roman Emperor or Senator commanding

Marianne von Werekin, 'Sunrise', 1920

  An endless line of men that tug the rope of a small boat soon disappear into murky, burning red waters beyond. Colour is fantastical, mystical and otherworldly, producing an atmosphere far from reality. This is the Symbolist work of Marianne von Werefkin, part of the German Expressionists that worked in Munich from the 1910s. A movement so often dominated by the male names of the time – Kandinsky especially – Werefkin was a vital participant, expanding the range of art produced and displayed, complementing her work with art theory and written sources, as well as creating her own Salon upon her arrival in Munich. It is easy to get lost in biography with a piece such as this. Wasted, human potential seems to be at the heart of this work, signalled by the endless line of men pushing forward towards the edge of the picture plane. There is a sense of struggle and a universality to the suffering through the portrayal of faceless men in similar blue tones. Looking at the date produced of 19

Mark Rothko, 'Light Red over Black', 1957

  My eye is not drawn to the painting itself but the title of the painting, 'Light Red Over Black'. We would automatically think that the black is on top of a red background, but Rothko has flipped this around, subverting the title just like he subverting the meaning of what it was to be an artist and what Art actually was. During this time, art was going through rapid changes, with abstract expressionism coming into full force (Rothko, Pollock). But Rothko showed that all this change was for the good, even if for him, it was short lived.  The colour red in this painting is searing and the black struggles to fully cover this velvety border, especially at the bottom of the canvas. Unlike the black squares which have a hazy quality to their edges, the red is clear and impregnable. It is hard to figure out what this represents - the Tate has suggested a window perhaps, but if it is a window then what are we looking out into? Perhaps it is night, or perhaps the viewer is catching a