Uccello, 'Hunt in the Forest', c.1470

THE HUNT IN THE FOREST | Ashmolean Museum

My eye is immediately drawn to the vanishing point of the painting, because that is what the use of perspective here is designed to do. My eye follows the leaping hunting dogs into the rows of trees and beyond to where every figure is excitedly heading. Everything about this piece screams symmetry, from the way the trees are positioned to the depiction of the animals and humans. Uccello has even laid down tree stumps and branches on the ground to point the viewer in the direction of one point perspective. By using these foreshortened logs he is spelling it out to the viewer - here is the perfection of Renaissance painting.

Although it may not be the most detailed painting in terms of the actual figures, everyone is at least doing something different. From the figures running into the trees to the men on horseback waving their arms to point the way for the viewer and the other hunters, this is a painting of movement and excitement. You can almost hear the cry of the dogs and calls of the men as they shout to one another for encouragement, firing the dogs into a frenzy in preparation for the meat they are about to catch. Furthermore, the viewer has a panoramic view of the forest, which not only involves them more fully within the painting but intrigues them as to what is occurring in the distance. Uccello has used a colour palette that goes from light to dark, meaning the viewer is being drawn into the darkness, making them ask questions about what is out there. Will this party be successful in their hunt? Or is this actually just a false alarm, and nothing will be caught at all? There is not just excitement in this painting, but there is intrigue. And this links back to the use of perspective.

Uccello was a master of linear perspective, and this painting is a great example, linking closely with the design of the perhaps more famous The Battle of San Romano. There the viewer sees not logs but lances to mark the perspective. Equally in the painting above Uccello has created that grid-like pattern to show his talent as an artist. Although Uccello may have glorified the hunt somewhat here, it does not lack emotion and drama. But with the dark sky and rolling clouds coming in, perhaps Uccello is foreshadowing an unsuccessful hunt after all.

Comments

Cellini, 'Perseus with the Head of Medusa', 1545-1554

My eye is immediately drawn to the head of Medusa. At first glance it looks gruesome, as though Cellini has captured the moment just after the head has been decapitated, and it oozes blood and bodily matter. However the viewer then notices the similarity between that and Medusa's hair. Maybe it is just her hair after all. Cellini has cleverly enticed the viewer in here, to take a closer look and therefore involved them in the sculpture as a whole. Once they do come closer, they begin to notice other things such as the similarity between Perseus' hair and Medusa's snakes. Hero and monster are not so separate. Even the features of their faces are very similar. Perhaps Cellini wants to suggest that evil can often wear the mask of good. Or he could even be implying that everyone has some evil within them, even the hero Perseus. One of the good things about sculpture is that the viewer is able to walk around it, and fully immerse themselves in the piece. Cellini has used this...

Tondino di Guerrino, 'Crucifix', 1325-30

The monumental crucifixes of Cimabue, Giotto and their followers, and their transition from Byzantine forms towards increased dynamism and naturalism, have been well studied. Equally, smaller works by French Gothic practitioners in ivory are now beginning to permeate scholarship, mainly through the detailed exploration by Sarah Guerin. The goldsmiths of Siena do not command as much attention. Yet, they hold the key to artistic synthesis in the early fourteenth century. This is proved by the small processional crucifix currently at the National Gallery's iteration of Siena: The Rise of Painting 1300-50, attributed to Tondino di Guerrino. Tondino combines enamel with an intricate gold sculptural presentation of the crucified Christ in this small, portable work. Instantly, the eye is drawn to the central element - the thin, skeletal body hanging from two stretched, emaciated arms. Christ's torso is drawn inwards, his ribs exposed, mimicking a sharp intake of breath. The downwa...

Artemisia Gentileschi, 'Jael and Sisera', c.1620

My eye firstly notices the hand wielding the hammer above the unsuspecting man's head. Gentileschi is depicting a new and particularly horrible kind of weapon here instead of the huge sword she gave Judith to slice Holofernes' head off in 1620. The tent peg seems all the more violent, especially as the viewer is looking at the split second before the deed has been committed. Moreover, the gaze of the women (Jael) is focused and calm, making the piece seem unnerving. This is not a moment of hesitation but a snapshot of action - the woman has made up her mind and will commit to this murder. The viewer can only imagine how Gentileschi would have depicted the bloody aftermath, in her usual violent and tenebristic way. The fact that the artist has signed her name in the tomb-like stone above the man is significant - she is signing his life away in this painting, sending him swiftly to the grave. The body of the man (Sisera) is also interestingly depicted. He lies in a rather eff...

Art and Eye

Search This Blog