Skip to main content

Charles Demuth, 'I Saw The Figure 5 In Gold', 1928

 Charles Demuth | I Saw the Figure 5 in Gold | The Met

My eye is at first drawn to the colour. That yellow instantly reminds me of the New York taxi cabs, and in my mind I link it to Mondrian's Broadway Boogie Woogie which also tries to capture the city of New York through art. Just as Mondrian used colour to emphasise the pulsating liveliness of the city, Demuth is using it to emphasise speed. The receding five represents the speed of the fire engine that this piece is based on, zooming past the viewer and down the avenue of the city. The red signifies danger, fire, heat, noise. But it also signifies that liveliness of the city and New York as a hub of culture and a hive of activity. It links to the flashing lights of Times Square and Broadway, and it suggests the discordant sounds of sirens wailing down the streets - Demuth is making a piece of art come alive and highlighting art's power to represent not only a place, but a way of life. 

Demuth was creating art in the Precisionist style and this is highlighted in I Saw The Figure 5 In Gold through the clean cut, geometric patterns and shafts of light and shade that are used instead of blending. These shafts again emphasise movement, and it if the viewer were to look at a different angle, the lighter colours would be in completely different places, as would the darker colours. The background shows fractured panes of apartment blocks, their angles suggesting height in an enclosed space. There are lines like telegraph wires and fragments of text like adverts and shop signs briefly glimpsed from the speeding vehicle. 

The circles of light above the large, yellow number five at first just look like streetlamps, but then become headlights, then eyes staring back at the viewer, who ironically happens to be observing themselves. There are larger 'eyes' that also make up the corners of the piece, which links back to the idea of the fire engine moving away from the viewer and the overall sense of movement of the artwork. There is a suggestion that the streets of the city would be dark if it were not for the headlights of this vehicle, therefore showing how they act as a guide for the fire engine and also a guide for the viewer in understanding this piece. This is the Roaring Twenties but there is a suggestion that not everything is glamorous and positive - the fire engine itself is a warning, the red reinforces this and the word 'bill' shouts out from the top of the canvas. There will be a price to pay.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Mark Rothko, 'Light Red over Black', 1957

  My eye is not drawn to the painting itself but the title of the painting, 'Light Red Over Black'. We would automatically think that the black is on top of a red background, but Rothko has flipped this around, subverting the title just like he subverting the meaning of what it was to be an artist and what Art actually was. During this time, art was going through rapid changes, with abstract expressionism coming into full force (Rothko, Pollock). But Rothko showed that all this change was for the good, even if for him, it was short lived.  The colour red in this painting is searing and the black struggles to fully cover this velvety border, especially at the bottom of the canvas. Unlike the black squares which have a hazy quality to their edges, the red is clear and impregnable. It is hard to figure out what this represents - the Tate has suggested a window perhaps, but if it is a window then what are we looking out into? Perhaps it is night, or perhaps the viewer is catching ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Frans Hals, 'The Laughing Cavalier', 1624

  The Laughing Cavalier is a man on the cusp of unseriousness. His eyes follow a viewer around the room, his curled moustache twitches endearingly as if he struggles to maintain composure, whilst his lip is pursed to stop laughter escaping. The pose, meanwhile, is proud and monumental, filling the canvas with a foreshortened elbow and shoulder pushing into a viewer's world, serving to emphasise the silks and expensive dress against the monochromatic background.  Frans Hals was first and foremost a portrait painter. His oeuvre includes wedding portraits of solo male and female sitters, multifigure works including The Banquet of Officers from 1627, yet his depictions often turned to peasants or comical characters, notably his Jester with a Lute now in the Louvre, proving that portrait painters also had range. The Laughing Cavalier remains an equally intriguing work: despite being Hals' most famous piece, the sitter remains anonymous. Yet, the smile is so familiar to a viewer, an...
Post a Comment
Read more

Artemisia Gentileschi, 'Jael and Sisera', c.1620

  My eye firstly notices the hand wielding the hammer above the unsuspecting man's head. Gentileschi is depicting a new and particularly horrible kind of weapon here instead of the huge sword she gave Judith to slice Holofernes' head off in 1620. The tent peg seems all the more violent, especially as the viewer is looking at the split second before the deed has been committed. Moreover, the gaze of the women (Jael) is focused and calm, making the piece seem unnerving. This is not a moment of hesitation but a snapshot of action - the woman has made up her mind and will commit to this murder. The viewer can only imagine how Gentileschi would have depicted the bloody aftermath, in her usual violent and tenebristic way. The fact that the artist has signed her name in the tomb-like stone above the man is significant - she is signing his life away in this painting, sending him swiftly to the grave.  The body of the man (Sisera) is also interestingly depicted. He lies in a rather eff...
Post a Comment
Read more