Skip to main content

Andrea Mantegna, 'St Sebastian', 1456-9


My eye is firstly drawn to the violence of the scene. Mantegna has juxtaposed Saint Sebastian's blemish-free and perfect, white skin with streaks of blood trickling from his many wounds. This is foregrounded by the arrow running through his face, straight through his third eye. There are so many arrows that they are difficult to follow them through the body, but the one through the head is deliberately clear. The viewer's eye is drawn towards this because of upwards, agonised gaze of Saint Sebastian himself, looking heavenwards to God. Interestingly, the entire painting has a surprising softness, both in brushwork and colour, considering it is such a violent subject matter. It is an image full of beautiful detail and precision rather than emotion and yet it has agony at its very centre.

Saint Sebastian's emotions are clearly depicted on his face, and the brown hair that acts as a kind of second halo to frame his face makes his features stand out even more. The emotions suggest confusion as well as pain. He is clearly very much alive, the whites of his eyes reflecting the white of the composition as a whole, but also referencing pain, and perhaps even fear. Furthermore, the twisted angles of his body and the clear definition of his ribs and diaphragm on his torso, heighten the agony of his wounds, even making the viewer sympathise with his position. His hands seem to be bound uncomfortably behind his back, yet his body is twisted, with his knees knocking together in a tense pose. There is no way for him to try and dull the pain, he must just endure it, exposed literally and metaphorically to this unavoidable consequence. Yet there is elegance to his pose. The contrapposto suggests Mantegna's interest in classical sculpture but there is also a sinuous Gothic feel to the 'S' shaped curve of his body and, like many depictions of Saint Sebastian, there is a sensual quality to his depiction of the nude.

Mantegna has included a huge amount of detail in his fifteenth century painting. Judging by his other works too, he clearly had an interest in architectural detailing, and the inclusion of an elaborate marble column and ruined Roman arch cements this. But there are also sculptural remnants scattered at the saint's feet: perhaps symbolic of the paganism defeated. The use of the tiled floor also shows the artist's skill and Renaissance interest in perspective. The gravel path in the background of the painting creates the sense of recession and furthers the three-dimensional nature of the piece. But you can also see figures on the road, and a peaceful pastoral landscape, ordinary life continuing, apparently oblivious of the saint's martyrdom. The colour of the painting as a whole is mostly white and blue, with occasional gold, such as the Byzantine-style halo above Sebastian's head. It is a serene palette, suggesting the purity of the saint's sacrifice. The sky fills nearly half of the pictorial space and Mantegna has even included a figure in the top left cloud referencing a path to Christian redemption, even in the darkest of times. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Nicola Pisano, 'Adoration of the Magi', Pisa Baptistery Pulpit Panel

  In this complex, lively, exciting pulpit panel the eye looks up towards the monumentality of the Virgin, who commands this scene. She is massive and powerful, the largest figure with thick swathes of drapery delineating her forcefully protruding knees out into the viewer's space. Seated but still retaining dominance, she defines the classicising style of Nicola Pisano, witnessed throughout the panels of his pulpit in Pisa. Many writers have described the style - Eloise Angiola for instance, refers to the 'sophisticated understanding of classical prototypes to create heroic human forms' in Nicola's pulpit. Certainly in Pisa the prominent debris from the classical past remained visible and Nicola easily had access to various ancient sarcophagi for direct emulation here. The Virgin's features with her serene expression and curled hair beneath the mantle are in fact quite androgenous. She quickly assumes the position of a monumental Roman Emperor or Senator commanding

Marianne von Werekin, 'Sunrise', 1920

  An endless line of men that tug the rope of a small boat soon disappear into murky, burning red waters beyond. Colour is fantastical, mystical and otherworldly, producing an atmosphere far from reality. This is the Symbolist work of Marianne von Werefkin, part of the German Expressionists that worked in Munich from the 1910s. A movement so often dominated by the male names of the time – Kandinsky especially – Werefkin was a vital participant, expanding the range of art produced and displayed, complementing her work with art theory and written sources, as well as creating her own Salon upon her arrival in Munich. It is easy to get lost in biography with a piece such as this. Wasted, human potential seems to be at the heart of this work, signalled by the endless line of men pushing forward towards the edge of the picture plane. There is a sense of struggle and a universality to the suffering through the portrayal of faceless men in similar blue tones. Looking at the date produced of 19

Mark Rothko, 'Light Red over Black', 1957

  My eye is not drawn to the painting itself but the title of the painting, 'Light Red Over Black'. We would automatically think that the black is on top of a red background, but Rothko has flipped this around, subverting the title just like he subverting the meaning of what it was to be an artist and what Art actually was. During this time, art was going through rapid changes, with abstract expressionism coming into full force (Rothko, Pollock). But Rothko showed that all this change was for the good, even if for him, it was short lived.  The colour red in this painting is searing and the black struggles to fully cover this velvety border, especially at the bottom of the canvas. Unlike the black squares which have a hazy quality to their edges, the red is clear and impregnable. It is hard to figure out what this represents - the Tate has suggested a window perhaps, but if it is a window then what are we looking out into? Perhaps it is night, or perhaps the viewer is catching a