Skip to main content

Casper Friedrich, 'Wanderer Above the Sea of Fog', 1818





My eye is immediately drawn to the use of Rückenfigur by Friedrich, where the figure stands with their back to the viewer and is seen from behind, creating the sense of the viewer looking out at another viewer, within the canvas. It also adds to the layers of the composition, with the figure in the immediate foreground and the landscape receding in front of him. This enables the viewer to identify with that figure in the painting, and involves the onlooker in the picture more, almost suggesting that they are as central to this art as the man standing before them. The viewer enters the canvas and is at once dwarfed by the Romantic notion of the sublime, and the completely overwhelming power of the natural world. The contrapposto stance of the figure perhaps reflects his uneasiness in the scene - nature is making him unsure of himself and unsteady on his feet, making him question his motives and path through life. However, the fact that the viewer cannot see the figure's face means that it is difficult to know exactly what he is thinking. The viewer starts to put their own emotions onto the face of this man. 

Mountainous peaks rise up out of the mist and cloud in front of the figure, linking to the choice of title - the mist is actually a sea, forever moving and changing, never constant. Friedrich implies, with his limited colour palette of greys and whites, that nature does not have to be traditionally beautiful to be awe-inspiring. Painted in 1818, Friedrich here references the works of Romantic poets such as Wordsworth ('huge peak, black and huge') who also focused on the contemplation of nature. The way that the wisps of mist are dragged across the canvas perhaps suggests a slight breeze is blowing, the same breeze that ruffles the hair of the figure, the only real change of colour in the whole painting. There is a distinct line of cloud through the centre of the canvas, which seems to be emanating from the figure himself. Perhaps Friedrich is implying that nature comes from within, or could simply be suggesting the colossal force that nature has on one's soul. This is the force that is unbalancing the figure in the canvas, linking back to his contrapposto stance.

The landscape dwarfs the figure. Judging by his clothes, the figure looks like a well respected member of society, but the fact that he is swamped in nature in this setting highlights that ultimately his status means nothing here. Friedrich's landscapes are full of ambiguity, and the viewer can never really tell what the underlying message is, but they are also highly symbolic. The figure here is obviously young, standing on the solidity of the present looking out on an unknown future. Although there are many pessimistic readings, the use of the Golden Section and the lightness of the horizon suggest otherwise. In fact, there is definite balance and harmony in this piece. The figure is ultimately above the mist, and he has found himself through his contemplation. 
 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Nicola Pisano, 'Adoration of the Magi', Pisa Baptistery Pulpit Panel

  In this complex, lively, exciting pulpit panel the eye looks up towards the monumentality of the Virgin, who commands this scene. She is massive and powerful, the largest figure with thick swathes of drapery delineating her forcefully protruding knees out into the viewer's space. Seated but still retaining dominance, she defines the classicising style of Nicola Pisano, witnessed throughout the panels of his pulpit in Pisa. Many writers have described the style - Eloise Angiola for instance, refers to the 'sophisticated understanding of classical prototypes to create heroic human forms' in Nicola's pulpit. Certainly in Pisa the prominent debris from the classical past remained visible and Nicola easily had access to various ancient sarcophagi for direct emulation here. The Virgin's features with her serene expression and curled hair beneath the mantle are in fact quite androgenous. She quickly assumes the position of a monumental Roman Emperor or Senator commanding

Marianne von Werekin, 'Sunrise', 1920

  An endless line of men that tug the rope of a small boat soon disappear into murky, burning red waters beyond. Colour is fantastical, mystical and otherworldly, producing an atmosphere far from reality. This is the Symbolist work of Marianne von Werefkin, part of the German Expressionists that worked in Munich from the 1910s. A movement so often dominated by the male names of the time – Kandinsky especially – Werefkin was a vital participant, expanding the range of art produced and displayed, complementing her work with art theory and written sources, as well as creating her own Salon upon her arrival in Munich. It is easy to get lost in biography with a piece such as this. Wasted, human potential seems to be at the heart of this work, signalled by the endless line of men pushing forward towards the edge of the picture plane. There is a sense of struggle and a universality to the suffering through the portrayal of faceless men in similar blue tones. Looking at the date produced of 19

Mark Rothko, 'Light Red over Black', 1957

  My eye is not drawn to the painting itself but the title of the painting, 'Light Red Over Black'. We would automatically think that the black is on top of a red background, but Rothko has flipped this around, subverting the title just like he subverting the meaning of what it was to be an artist and what Art actually was. During this time, art was going through rapid changes, with abstract expressionism coming into full force (Rothko, Pollock). But Rothko showed that all this change was for the good, even if for him, it was short lived.  The colour red in this painting is searing and the black struggles to fully cover this velvety border, especially at the bottom of the canvas. Unlike the black squares which have a hazy quality to their edges, the red is clear and impregnable. It is hard to figure out what this represents - the Tate has suggested a window perhaps, but if it is a window then what are we looking out into? Perhaps it is night, or perhaps the viewer is catching a