Skip to main content

Helen Frankenthaler, 'Freefall', 1993 (Radical Beauty exhibition)

 


The eye-opening exhibition of woodcuts by artist Helen Frankenthaler at Dulwich Picture Gallery from 15 Sept 2021-18 April 2022 encouraged a closer look by the eye at this often neglected medium. Obvious images that come to mind from the word 'woodcut' might be associated with Albrecht Durer or the works of the German Expressionists. But Frankenthaler goes a stage further, giving her woodcuts a radical yet beautiful twist, as the title of the exhibition so aptly described.

Right at the start of the exhibition, the eye is engulfed by Freefall. Already the name of the piece resonates with an amateur studying woodcuts; the viewer plunges themselves into the abyss of this relatively underexplored medium, freefalling into the mind of the artist herself. The title also implies a freedom of expression. As a prominent second generation Abstract Expressionist and pioneer of the colour-field painting technique, Frankenthaler's better-known paintings tend to evoke a feeling rather than representing a rational object or concept. Freefall is just the same, not obviously representing anything. This, coupled with the lack of obvious finish to the piece, with edges that are not symmetrical, makes viewing these woodcuts a personal experience.

But the exact processes behind Frankenthaler's works are difficult for the amateur to grasp. Frankenthaler had a large team of people working with her; woodblock cutters, artists working on initial designs as well as on the many proofs before the final product. This may be a personal experience for the viewer, but the complex processes make us question whether this was an equally personal experience for Frankenthaler, and whether the automatism of Abstract Expressionsim has been lost in the meticulous making processes. Freefall is a twelve-coloured woodcut made from twenty-one woodblocks on hand dyed paper. The sheer time and effort taken to create the final Freefall displayed in the exhibition is almost impossible for the viewer to digest. Nevertheless, it shows the artist's skill, and it elevates the medium of woodcut from traditional beliefs of it being a 'primitive' and limited medium.

Freefall is big, immediately instilling a feeling of massiveness and monumentality at the start of the exhibition. Placed on the centre of a stark white wall, the rich, ultramarine blue surrounds the viewer, engulfing them and bringing them right into the heart of the exhibition space, enveloped into the world of woodcut. The exhibition as a whole continues to be just as immersive as this first woodcut that is displayed, furthering the suggestion of careful planning in making the space and placement of Frankenthaler's works complement each other. But the ultramarine blue of Freefall is not without its imperfections. Upon closer inspection, the grain of wood is visible which brings a tangibility to the piece, a suggestion of the artist's hand. There are streaks and lines breaking up the cool sea of blue, disrupting the rhythms of this colour. At the bottom of the woodblock the eye is startled by a sudden line of bright yellow, at odds to the central theme of blue. What does the line represent? Or more importantly, how does the yellow line make the viewer feel? Perhaps this is some sort of landscape, bringing the viewer back to reality. You cannot be in freefall forever. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Artemisia Gentileschi, 'Jael and Sisera', c.1620

  My eye firstly notices the hand wielding the hammer above the unsuspecting man's head. Gentileschi is depicting a new and particularly horrible kind of weapon here instead of the huge sword she gave Judith to slice Holofernes' head off in 1620. The tent peg seems all the more violent, especially as the viewer is looking at the split second before the deed has been committed. Moreover, the gaze of the women (Jael) is focused and calm, making the piece seem unnerving. This is not a moment of hesitation but a snapshot of action - the woman has made up her mind and will commit to this murder. The viewer can only imagine how Gentileschi would have depicted the bloody aftermath, in her usual violent and tenebristic way. The fact that the artist has signed her name in the tomb-like stone above the man is significant - she is signing his life away in this painting, sending him swiftly to the grave.  The body of the man (Sisera) is also interestingly depicted. He lies in a rather eff...
Post a Comment
Read more

Cellini, 'Perseus with the Head of Medusa', 1545-1554

  My eye is immediately drawn to the head of Medusa. At first glance it looks gruesome, as though Cellini has captured the moment just after the head has been decapitated, and it oozes blood and bodily matter. However the viewer then notices the similarity between that and Medusa's hair. Maybe it is just her hair after all. Cellini has cleverly enticed the viewer in here, to take a closer look and therefore involved them in the sculpture as a whole. Once they do come closer, they begin to notice other things such as the similarity between Perseus' hair and Medusa's snakes. Hero and monster are not so separate. Even the features of their faces are very similar. Perhaps Cellini wants to suggest that evil can often wear the mask of good. Or he could even be implying that everyone has some evil within them, even the hero Perseus.  One of the good things about sculpture is that the viewer is able to walk around it, and fully immerse themselves in the piece. Cellini has used this...
Post a Comment
Read more

John Everett Millais, 'Peace Concluded', 1856

  My eye is drawn to the copy of The Times clutched in the hands of the officer. The white of the figurine on the man's knee and the white of his wife's sleeves all serve to make the white paper stand out even more on the canvas. As the title of the painting suggests, this is about the end of the Crimean War, seemingly depicting a soldier who has just returned home, surrounded by his family, but the mood is perhaps less euphoric than you might expect. The soldier seems somber and weary, and his wife has a look of concern. Although on the surface it seems to be quite a harmonious composition representing a close knit and traditional family, the positioning of the man is odd. It is his wife who takes her place at the apex of the triangular composition, the soldier is reduced to an emasculated role, perhaps an invalid, as suggested by the blanket over his legs. Her face is passive, but not exactly positive. With her arms draped around her husband, she looks posed, dutiful but not...
Post a Comment
Read more