Skip to main content

Jasper Johns, 'Diver', 1962-3

 



My eye is drawn to an overall sense of darkness. The monochrome palette made up of charcoal and pastel sucks the viewer in, plunging them into the canvas and echoing the title of the piece. This is foregrounded by Johns' stencilling of the word Diver on the bottom left hand corner of the piece, barely visible against the murky colours. The capitalisation of the word seems like a warning - do not be pulled under. Diver has been interpreted to be Johns paying homage to the suicide of Hart Crane, an American poet who jumped overboard a ship in the 1930s, his body never being recovered. With this interpretation in mind, both the dark colour palette and warning label below the anchor shape depicted are even more emotionally effective. 

If Johns is referencing Crane's suicide, he takes the human element of the painting further. Johns said that he wanted to convey the idea of a 'swan dive' through this depiction. Despite an overall darkness, there are graceful movements to the brushwork. As one swan dives towards the water, their arms sweep out, just as Johns has swept his brush across the mounted canvas to create the head of the anchor shape. The body is a vertical line during the dive, Johns using the line of connection between the two panels in the centre of the piece to portray this. The title is not 'dive' or 'diving', but the 'er' again amplifies the sense of humanity behind the piece, giving its sense of purpose. In addition, Johns has dotted handprints about the painting, adding depth to an otherwise flat, monochrome picture plane. The work therefore does not just have vertical depth, but also three dimensional depth, the hands standing out to the viewer and interacting with their eye. The handprints at the base of the anchor in particular hark back to the idea of the swan dive, the hands pulling apart to the create the arc that forms the head of the anchor. 

Johns' inclusion of the anchor shape, however, adds weight to the piece. Not only does the strong, vertical and the approximate symmetry of the anchor imply depth and downward movement, but even the eye itself seems to be dragged downward. The painting itself is large, and would be especially evocative on the white walls of the modern galley space. Often critics compare a dark colour palette to the artist's apparent state of mind - Mark Rothko used dark tones throughout the 1970s to perhaps signal a man spiralling further into depression. With Crane's suicide in mind, there is definitely a darker reading to the painting, with seemingly no light breaking through and no hope of reaching the surface once again. The viewer is instead anchored to the painting, not able to look away, dragged down towards the seabed and the abyss. The colours envelope the real world, and it becomes our very own handprints on the canvas that claw at the darkness, desperately trying to find the light.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Mark Rothko, 'Light Red over Black', 1957

  My eye is not drawn to the painting itself but the title of the painting, 'Light Red Over Black'. We would automatically think that the black is on top of a red background, but Rothko has flipped this around, subverting the title just like he subverting the meaning of what it was to be an artist and what Art actually was. During this time, art was going through rapid changes, with abstract expressionism coming into full force (Rothko, Pollock). But Rothko showed that all this change was for the good, even if for him, it was short lived.  The colour red in this painting is searing and the black struggles to fully cover this velvety border, especially at the bottom of the canvas. Unlike the black squares which have a hazy quality to their edges, the red is clear and impregnable. It is hard to figure out what this represents - the Tate has suggested a window perhaps, but if it is a window then what are we looking out into? Perhaps it is night, or perhaps the viewer is catching ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Egon Schiele, 'Dead Mother', 1910

  My eye is drawn to the hand. Those long, bony fingers are so characteristic of Schiele but here they are particularly skeletal and deathly – the veins seem to have been injected with poison. And they are a warning right in the foreground of the painting that keeps the viewer at bay as an outsider to this incredibly intimate relationship between mother and child, and sets the tone of death and mortality which hangs over the whole image. The mother cradles her child in a womb-like shroud, alluding to childbirth and the death of the mother explained in the title. She seems desperate to feel that bodily connection with her child, highlighted by the emphasis on her craned neck as she tries to connect to the baby. There is a clear link between the mother’s bent neck and the child’s bent neck, again emphasising their longing to be with each other. However, the darkness around the child is almost like ropes, with flecks of white in the painting making it look as though the darkness is wo...
Post a Comment
Read more

Artemisia Gentileschi, 'Jael and Sisera', c.1620

  My eye firstly notices the hand wielding the hammer above the unsuspecting man's head. Gentileschi is depicting a new and particularly horrible kind of weapon here instead of the huge sword she gave Judith to slice Holofernes' head off in 1620. The tent peg seems all the more violent, especially as the viewer is looking at the split second before the deed has been committed. Moreover, the gaze of the women (Jael) is focused and calm, making the piece seem unnerving. This is not a moment of hesitation but a snapshot of action - the woman has made up her mind and will commit to this murder. The viewer can only imagine how Gentileschi would have depicted the bloody aftermath, in her usual violent and tenebristic way. The fact that the artist has signed her name in the tomb-like stone above the man is significant - she is signing his life away in this painting, sending him swiftly to the grave.  The body of the man (Sisera) is also interestingly depicted. He lies in a rather eff...
Post a Comment
Read more