Skip to main content

Titian, 'Man with a Glove', c.1520

 

In many ways this portrait seems conventional to the eye. The flattening, dark background, the three quarter length view, the wandering gaze of the sitter - all are common tropes in sixteenth century portraiture. Equally, the dress of the sitter is of the time, showing off his patrician status, his jewels but also his refined nature as his black jacket melts into the background. However, the mastery of Titian means that this piece quickly deviates from convention. Titian had already pioneered the use of the parapet in portraiture; Man with a Quilted Sleeve in London's National Gallery painted ten years prior to the piece above, is the prime example of a figure encroaching in on our space and twisting elegantly towards us. Here the unknown sitter leans on a similar device, allowing the painting to extend into our space so it is not such a flat design. The artist has used this device to also place his signature on the piece, and thus stamp his artistic authority. 

The origins of the sitter and the display of this piece are not known. It could originate from the Gonzaga collection in Mantua, but this has been disputed. It's size is moderate (100x89cm) and its display in a palace environment may be expected. Equally it could have been displayed in the Venetian portego a long, hall-like room where guests were entertained, made especially for the display of paintings along its walls. This display could account for the wandering gaze of the figure - perhaps he interacts with others on the walls. And his pointing finger could also be gesturing to another part of the room. 

With no display information, however, we can only assume that the finger either points to show off the ring and therefore his material richness, or points to the gloves, which form the centerpiece of this composition, foregrounded in the title. Titian has delicately rendered the ungloved hand - we see him entering his mature style here into the 1520s, as his genius emerges. These are not the hands of a man who has laboured all this life, but are elegant, graceful, perhaps even fragile. Peter Stallybrass and Ann Rosalind Jones write extensively on fetishising the glove, describing the paradox created by removing the glove: attention is given to the hands while making them useless, or rather only useful for putting on and removing the glove. In the sitter's other hand are both gloves, slashed across the back as a sign of fashionable nonchalance. However the leather does look rather ragged, and the removed glove is lifeless and drooping, whilst the fingers barely reach the ends of the leather. Though the sitter's face remains a picture of perfection, the gloves seem aged and ravaged by violence. The sitter's face seems a little unsure of himself, as if he is trying to retreat into the darkness of the background. He is not so world weary as the glove he has removed from his hands. There is almost a ghostly grey pallor to the glove that no longer holds a hand, empty of flesh and blood, discarded and no longer of use. The complexities of iconography in Titian's piece therefore lie in the materialism identified in the title; the glove itself. 


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Mark Rothko, 'Light Red over Black', 1957

  My eye is not drawn to the painting itself but the title of the painting, 'Light Red Over Black'. We would automatically think that the black is on top of a red background, but Rothko has flipped this around, subverting the title just like he subverting the meaning of what it was to be an artist and what Art actually was. During this time, art was going through rapid changes, with abstract expressionism coming into full force (Rothko, Pollock). But Rothko showed that all this change was for the good, even if for him, it was short lived.  The colour red in this painting is searing and the black struggles to fully cover this velvety border, especially at the bottom of the canvas. Unlike the black squares which have a hazy quality to their edges, the red is clear and impregnable. It is hard to figure out what this represents - the Tate has suggested a window perhaps, but if it is a window then what are we looking out into? Perhaps it is night, or perhaps the viewer is catching ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Egon Schiele, 'Dead Mother', 1910

  My eye is drawn to the hand. Those long, bony fingers are so characteristic of Schiele but here they are particularly skeletal and deathly – the veins seem to have been injected with poison. And they are a warning right in the foreground of the painting that keeps the viewer at bay as an outsider to this incredibly intimate relationship between mother and child, and sets the tone of death and mortality which hangs over the whole image. The mother cradles her child in a womb-like shroud, alluding to childbirth and the death of the mother explained in the title. She seems desperate to feel that bodily connection with her child, highlighted by the emphasis on her craned neck as she tries to connect to the baby. There is a clear link between the mother’s bent neck and the child’s bent neck, again emphasising their longing to be with each other. However, the darkness around the child is almost like ropes, with flecks of white in the painting making it look as though the darkness is wo...
Post a Comment
Read more

Artemisia Gentileschi, 'Jael and Sisera', c.1620

  My eye firstly notices the hand wielding the hammer above the unsuspecting man's head. Gentileschi is depicting a new and particularly horrible kind of weapon here instead of the huge sword she gave Judith to slice Holofernes' head off in 1620. The tent peg seems all the more violent, especially as the viewer is looking at the split second before the deed has been committed. Moreover, the gaze of the women (Jael) is focused and calm, making the piece seem unnerving. This is not a moment of hesitation but a snapshot of action - the woman has made up her mind and will commit to this murder. The viewer can only imagine how Gentileschi would have depicted the bloody aftermath, in her usual violent and tenebristic way. The fact that the artist has signed her name in the tomb-like stone above the man is significant - she is signing his life away in this painting, sending him swiftly to the grave.  The body of the man (Sisera) is also interestingly depicted. He lies in a rather eff...
Post a Comment
Read more