Skip to main content

Sandro Botticelli, 'Portrait of a Man with a Medal', 1474-5

 


The identity of the sitter that meets the eye of the viewer remains much discussed and ultimately unknown. Some think it to be Botticelli himself, but born around 1445 and so in his thirties when the painting was done, others deem it unlikely. It could be his brother Antonio, in keeping with the family likeness. Perhaps it is a goldsmith who designed the medallion presented to us, such as Michelozzo, who interestingly also had a hand in the creation of the Palazzo Medici. Ultimately, most scholars believe it either to be a member of the Medici family or a supporter, due to the medal showing the likeness of Cosimo de' Medici. It would make sense for the man to be one of Cosimo's sons, making this a piece of propaganda to display Medici family lineage. Interweaving portraiture into commissions was a common way of showing the enduring family heritage of prominent Florentine families. In Botticelli's own Adoration of the Magi there are multiple Medici portraits. Moreover the Benozzo Gozzoli frescoes in the Medici chapel attribute the family to the Magi themselves, adding a biblical and kingly quality to their family name. Nevertheless, Sean Connolly refers to the subject as almost 'as mysterious as Leonardo da Vinci's Mona Lisa'.

More interesting than the ambiguities of subject are the techniques of making in the work. What seems like a standard portrait when viewed from a reproduction is actually a three-dimensional, tactile masterpiece by the artist. The three-quarter length portrait is essentially two-dimensional as a painting on panel, but a hole has been cut into the panel and a copy of a real portrait medallion inserted into that space. Using the technique of pastiglia, gesso is used to build up the surface to achieve low relief, and is gilded (a thin layer of gold leaf applied over the top) to create a three dimensional mimicry of gilded bronze. It is entirely possible that Botticelli had access to an existing medallion - examples featuring Cosimo on the face of the coin can be found in the V&A collection. The medal is exquisitely detailed, referencing Cosimo as Pater Patriae (father of the fatherland) and shimmering with almost divine intervention. Through this medallion, Botticelli also makes reference to Classical Greek and Roman coins, equating Cosimo to the great rulers of the past, emphasising the Medici right to rule Florence, which would be continually contested for generations. 

By the 1470s Botticelli was known for his capabilities in portraiture. The angle of the face is chosen so that the face of the coin and face of the sitter do not challenge each other, but allow both to be equally respected. Dressed as a Florentine humanist, the tie of the figure's clothing mimics the elegant turn of the head. Perhaps Botticelli was hoping to distract the viewer with the tactile interest of the coin, because there are some places where the portrait falls short. The hands, for instance, pose difficulties for the artist - they unconvincingly are fitted around the medallion and twisted outward awkwardly to present the 'bronze' creation to us. He needed the coin to not only face outwards but to be fitted over the sitter's heart, out of respect for the Medici. Equally, Botticelli has chosen to incorporate a birds-eye view of the landscape, very experimental, and possibly having its origins in Flemish painting. Ultimately this was not something he included in his portraits again. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Nicola Pisano, 'Adoration of the Magi', Pisa Baptistery Pulpit Panel

  In this complex, lively, exciting pulpit panel the eye looks up towards the monumentality of the Virgin, who commands this scene. She is massive and powerful, the largest figure with thick swathes of drapery delineating her forcefully protruding knees out into the viewer's space. Seated but still retaining dominance, she defines the classicising style of Nicola Pisano, witnessed throughout the panels of his pulpit in Pisa. Many writers have described the style - Eloise Angiola for instance, refers to the 'sophisticated understanding of classical prototypes to create heroic human forms' in Nicola's pulpit. Certainly in Pisa the prominent debris from the classical past remained visible and Nicola easily had access to various ancient sarcophagi for direct emulation here. The Virgin's features with her serene expression and curled hair beneath the mantle are in fact quite androgenous. She quickly assumes the position of a monumental Roman Emperor or Senator commanding

Marianne von Werekin, 'Sunrise', 1920

  An endless line of men that tug the rope of a small boat soon disappear into murky, burning red waters beyond. Colour is fantastical, mystical and otherworldly, producing an atmosphere far from reality. This is the Symbolist work of Marianne von Werefkin, part of the German Expressionists that worked in Munich from the 1910s. A movement so often dominated by the male names of the time – Kandinsky especially – Werefkin was a vital participant, expanding the range of art produced and displayed, complementing her work with art theory and written sources, as well as creating her own Salon upon her arrival in Munich. It is easy to get lost in biography with a piece such as this. Wasted, human potential seems to be at the heart of this work, signalled by the endless line of men pushing forward towards the edge of the picture plane. There is a sense of struggle and a universality to the suffering through the portrayal of faceless men in similar blue tones. Looking at the date produced of 19

Mark Rothko, 'Light Red over Black', 1957

  My eye is not drawn to the painting itself but the title of the painting, 'Light Red Over Black'. We would automatically think that the black is on top of a red background, but Rothko has flipped this around, subverting the title just like he subverting the meaning of what it was to be an artist and what Art actually was. During this time, art was going through rapid changes, with abstract expressionism coming into full force (Rothko, Pollock). But Rothko showed that all this change was for the good, even if for him, it was short lived.  The colour red in this painting is searing and the black struggles to fully cover this velvety border, especially at the bottom of the canvas. Unlike the black squares which have a hazy quality to their edges, the red is clear and impregnable. It is hard to figure out what this represents - the Tate has suggested a window perhaps, but if it is a window then what are we looking out into? Perhaps it is night, or perhaps the viewer is catching a