Skip to main content

G.F. Watts, 'Power and Energy', 1880s-1904

 


My eye is overwhelmed by the monumentality of this sculpture. Although it could simply be dismissed as another equestrian statue, an unknown horse and rider, the title given highlights the chosen message conveyed, backed up by the scale of the piece. Known primarily as a painter and with his sculptural works mostly forgotten, it is perhaps surprising to attribute such a piece to painter George Frederic Watts. However, his figures in his paintings often have a sculptural feel to them, and he did model some before translating their forms onto canvas. Furthermore an interest in texture has always been prominent in his works, shown here by his modelling in gesso which produces a puckered effect while the gesso is still wet. The emphasises the movement of the piece, the feel of dynamism, almost prefiguring Futurism, as the muscles of the horse contract and the male figure's body contorts and elongates to control the animal beneath him. 

The statue is not without its complicated history. As a sculpture in bronze, it can be recast and effectively mass produced, and is therefore situated in multiple locations (this particular design is found in Kensington Gardens). Another replica was commissioned in 1959 as a memorial to Cecil Rhodes in South Africa. With its dynamic and powerful pose, the sculpture is well suited to depicting a commanding figure like Rhodes. Upon gaining independence no less than ten years later, there were demands by Zambia for the sculpture to be removed. That version now resides in the National Archives of Zimbabwe, alongside other dismantled colonial monuments. As well as this, R.E. Gutch discusses Watts's use of the Parthenon Marbles for inspiration, looted artifacts that found their way to Britain with the accompanying baggage of colonialism. The head of the horse is more or less copied from the frieze. Equally, Gutch believes the rider to be modelled on the form of Dionysus, although this is less clear. 

It is therefore no surprise that the sculpture was an obsession of Watts for the last thirty years of his career, as he played around with the figure, the horse, the action, gesture, movement and dynamism. Viewed in the round in the naturalistic setting of the gardens, one can appreciate the full extent of Watts's mastery over the medium. Not only does he reflect the power of man and beast in this work, but also incorporates the quintessential Victorian beliefs of power, dynamism and striving towards the future. The gaze of the rider tilted upwards is almost like a propagandist poster, looking forward to a new day, the next innovation, and a fresh utopia. Watts's interest in Power and Energy must be read with Victorian attitudes in mind. This forgotten sculpture needs to be appreciated not just for its manipulation of the medium of bronze, a calling towards modernist sculpture, but also for its Victorian implications and surrounding legacies of colonialism. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mark Rothko, 'Light Red over Black', 1957

  My eye is not drawn to the painting itself but the title of the painting, 'Light Red Over Black'. We would automatically think that the black is on top of a red background, but Rothko has flipped this around, subverting the title just like he subverting the meaning of what it was to be an artist and what Art actually was. During this time, art was going through rapid changes, with abstract expressionism coming into full force (Rothko, Pollock). But Rothko showed that all this change was for the good, even if for him, it was short lived.  The colour red in this painting is searing and the black struggles to fully cover this velvety border, especially at the bottom of the canvas. Unlike the black squares which have a hazy quality to their edges, the red is clear and impregnable. It is hard to figure out what this represents - the Tate has suggested a window perhaps, but if it is a window then what are we looking out into? Perhaps it is night, or perhaps the viewer is catching ...

Frans Hals, 'The Laughing Cavalier', 1624

  The Laughing Cavalier is a man on the cusp of unseriousness. His eyes follow a viewer around the room, his curled moustache twitches endearingly as if he struggles to maintain composure, whilst his lip is pursed to stop laughter escaping. The pose, meanwhile, is proud and monumental, filling the canvas with a foreshortened elbow and shoulder pushing into a viewer's world, serving to emphasise the silks and expensive dress against the monochromatic background.  Frans Hals was first and foremost a portrait painter. His oeuvre includes wedding portraits of solo male and female sitters, multifigure works including The Banquet of Officers from 1627, yet his depictions often turned to peasants or comical characters, notably his Jester with a Lute now in the Louvre, proving that portrait painters also had range. The Laughing Cavalier remains an equally intriguing work: despite being Hals' most famous piece, the sitter remains anonymous. Yet, the smile is so familiar to a viewer, an...

Artemisia Gentileschi, 'Jael and Sisera', c.1620

  My eye firstly notices the hand wielding the hammer above the unsuspecting man's head. Gentileschi is depicting a new and particularly horrible kind of weapon here instead of the huge sword she gave Judith to slice Holofernes' head off in 1620. The tent peg seems all the more violent, especially as the viewer is looking at the split second before the deed has been committed. Moreover, the gaze of the women (Jael) is focused and calm, making the piece seem unnerving. This is not a moment of hesitation but a snapshot of action - the woman has made up her mind and will commit to this murder. The viewer can only imagine how Gentileschi would have depicted the bloody aftermath, in her usual violent and tenebristic way. The fact that the artist has signed her name in the tomb-like stone above the man is significant - she is signing his life away in this painting, sending him swiftly to the grave.  The body of the man (Sisera) is also interestingly depicted. He lies in a rather eff...