Skip to main content

Michael Damaskinos, 'Stoning of Saint Stephen', c.1591

 


For a painting that seems to the eye so rooted in the Byzantine traditions of icon painting, it is altogether surprising that the date comes from the mid to late sixteenth century. Here, the artist Michael Damaskinos is conflating style and iconography. He was extremely well travelled - born in Crete he learnt the ways of icon painting, before travelling to Venice and subsequently all across Italy, where his style became infused with Italian naturalism. Despite this, he retained his alla Grecia manner, and highlighted his Greek roots in his decoration of San Giorgio dei Greci in Venice, literally the church of the Greeks. Twenty-five of the artist's major works are in Venice and twenty located in this church alone. Having apparently trained El Greco, Damaskinos was the master of the Cretan school of icon painting, and the Venetians recognised his importance. 

Given the rather vague dating of the Stoning of Saint Stephen, one can presume Damaskinos created the work when he was in Venice. Surrounded by the Italian masters, he would have been familiar with the artistic output of the time, especially in Venice which arguably held the first art market of the early modern period. A key depiction of the same subject is by the brothers Jacopo and Domenico Tintoretto of a similar date. A youthful Saint Stephen kneels in the foreground, just as in the work by Damaskinos. Moreover, the figure hurling the large stone towards the saint in Damaskinos' work seems like a direct quotation from the depiction by the Tintoretto brothers. Or, perhaps Damaskinos was familiar with the work of Giulio Romano from the start of the sixteenth century, where again this figure heaving the rock above his head is depicted. The hands of Saint Stephen in both Giulio and Damaskinos' works are also splayed outwards, recalling artworks depicting the stigmatisation of Saint Francis, conflating the iconography of saints. The twisting bodies that Damaskinos has attempted to render in some of his figures also recalls the approach of these Italian artists. 

However, Damaskinos continues to show off his Cretan origins. For instance, he cannot render the separation of the plane of God above the saint because his background remains rooted in the Byzantine propensity for gold. Equally the solid gold halo of Saint Stephen is giant and unyielding in the centre of the panel, something the Italian artists have dropped. He has also utilised the technique of mordant gilding to decorate the sash that Saint Stephen wears, enhancing the perfomativity of the panel which was a key aspect of icon painting. What is particularly unusual, however, is the contrast between Byzantine elongation and archaism in the hands of Saint Stephen and indeed the faces of the surrounding figures, whilst the face of Saint Stephen is incredibly emotional. Damaskinos has attempted Italian naturalism here, and the viewer witnesses the pain and grief of the saint's torture. He looks up towards the sky in perhaps a final conflicted questioning of his faith. Surrounded by that Byzantine halo, the eye is propelled towards this devotional epicentre of the piece, and the pained expression of this martyred saint. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mark Rothko, 'Light Red over Black', 1957

  My eye is not drawn to the painting itself but the title of the painting, 'Light Red Over Black'. We would automatically think that the black is on top of a red background, but Rothko has flipped this around, subverting the title just like he subverting the meaning of what it was to be an artist and what Art actually was. During this time, art was going through rapid changes, with abstract expressionism coming into full force (Rothko, Pollock). But Rothko showed that all this change was for the good, even if for him, it was short lived.  The colour red in this painting is searing and the black struggles to fully cover this velvety border, especially at the bottom of the canvas. Unlike the black squares which have a hazy quality to their edges, the red is clear and impregnable. It is hard to figure out what this represents - the Tate has suggested a window perhaps, but if it is a window then what are we looking out into? Perhaps it is night, or perhaps the viewer is catching ...

Frans Hals, 'The Laughing Cavalier', 1624

  The Laughing Cavalier is a man on the cusp of unseriousness. His eyes follow a viewer around the room, his curled moustache twitches endearingly as if he struggles to maintain composure, whilst his lip is pursed to stop laughter escaping. The pose, meanwhile, is proud and monumental, filling the canvas with a foreshortened elbow and shoulder pushing into a viewer's world, serving to emphasise the silks and expensive dress against the monochromatic background.  Frans Hals was first and foremost a portrait painter. His oeuvre includes wedding portraits of solo male and female sitters, multifigure works including The Banquet of Officers from 1627, yet his depictions often turned to peasants or comical characters, notably his Jester with a Lute now in the Louvre, proving that portrait painters also had range. The Laughing Cavalier remains an equally intriguing work: despite being Hals' most famous piece, the sitter remains anonymous. Yet, the smile is so familiar to a viewer, an...

Artemisia Gentileschi, 'Jael and Sisera', c.1620

  My eye firstly notices the hand wielding the hammer above the unsuspecting man's head. Gentileschi is depicting a new and particularly horrible kind of weapon here instead of the huge sword she gave Judith to slice Holofernes' head off in 1620. The tent peg seems all the more violent, especially as the viewer is looking at the split second before the deed has been committed. Moreover, the gaze of the women (Jael) is focused and calm, making the piece seem unnerving. This is not a moment of hesitation but a snapshot of action - the woman has made up her mind and will commit to this murder. The viewer can only imagine how Gentileschi would have depicted the bloody aftermath, in her usual violent and tenebristic way. The fact that the artist has signed her name in the tomb-like stone above the man is significant - she is signing his life away in this painting, sending him swiftly to the grave.  The body of the man (Sisera) is also interestingly depicted. He lies in a rather eff...