Skip to main content

Anthony Van Dyck, 'Ecce Homo', 1621-7

 

It is difficult for the eye to decipher the true subject of this work. Most critics agree that Van Dyck depicts an Ecce Homo, the Latin words with which Pontius Pilate presented Christ, although others prefer to label it as a Man of Sorrows. Certainly the pain, emotion, resolution and turmoil is visible in both Christ's features and his body language. Like many artists Van Dyck seems attracted to this subject displaying deep suffering. The choice of a three-quarter length, turned profile allows the artist to exploit the stark nudity of Christ against a dark background. The flesh is dimpled, the arms veined and muscled, with flecks of blue in the canvas to give a human touch to Christ. The hands of Christ are brought in front of him, tied to show his capture and torment. A single tear drops down his deeply shadowed face, the twisting profile allowing Van Dyck to present heightened emotion. The light from his crown of thorns is all that pierces the darkness, echoed by the heavenly glow that seems to emanate from his pale skin. 

But there is another figure in this painting, difficult to see on the reproduction. In the right corner a Sub-Saharan African soldier spreads the royal robe behind Christ's back in a mocking gesture. His grinning face is disconcerting in the midst of the suffering of Christ, coupled with his twinkling eye. The contrast of the light and dark skin has been made very clear by the artist, as the black soldier is almost lost to the darkness of the canvas background completely. In this painting whiteness seemingly connotes power, incorporating seventeenth century racial views into the scene and ideas that still ring true today. Despite some sort of tear shape that falls from the eye of the black soldier mirroring Christ, recent examination of the painting has determined that this is a splash mark on the varnish. These details are much easier for the eye to digest in person at the Barber Institute in Birmingham. 

The painting is said to have come from the Palazzo Balbi in Genoa. Van Dyck certainly spent several years in Italy collecting works by fellow masters, and amassed a small but well focused collection. He certainly owned one religious subject by Titian, which happened to also be an Ecce Homo. However he recorded a number of different versions of the subject in his Italian Sketchbook, which perhaps shows why these piece is so emotionally evocative. A Man of Sorrows also by the artist is held in the Courtauld collection and has been suggested by Count Seilern as a modello for the later work in Birmingham. The rendering of both anatomy and drapery certainly is more developed and finished than the painting Seilern refers to. The drooping, weighty head of Christ coupled with the unsettling nature of the soldier come together in this particular piece for added emotional power.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mark Rothko, 'Light Red over Black', 1957

  My eye is not drawn to the painting itself but the title of the painting, 'Light Red Over Black'. We would automatically think that the black is on top of a red background, but Rothko has flipped this around, subverting the title just like he subverting the meaning of what it was to be an artist and what Art actually was. During this time, art was going through rapid changes, with abstract expressionism coming into full force (Rothko, Pollock). But Rothko showed that all this change was for the good, even if for him, it was short lived.  The colour red in this painting is searing and the black struggles to fully cover this velvety border, especially at the bottom of the canvas. Unlike the black squares which have a hazy quality to their edges, the red is clear and impregnable. It is hard to figure out what this represents - the Tate has suggested a window perhaps, but if it is a window then what are we looking out into? Perhaps it is night, or perhaps the viewer is catching ...

Artemisia Gentileschi, 'Jael and Sisera', c.1620

  My eye firstly notices the hand wielding the hammer above the unsuspecting man's head. Gentileschi is depicting a new and particularly horrible kind of weapon here instead of the huge sword she gave Judith to slice Holofernes' head off in 1620. The tent peg seems all the more violent, especially as the viewer is looking at the split second before the deed has been committed. Moreover, the gaze of the women (Jael) is focused and calm, making the piece seem unnerving. This is not a moment of hesitation but a snapshot of action - the woman has made up her mind and will commit to this murder. The viewer can only imagine how Gentileschi would have depicted the bloody aftermath, in her usual violent and tenebristic way. The fact that the artist has signed her name in the tomb-like stone above the man is significant - she is signing his life away in this painting, sending him swiftly to the grave.  The body of the man (Sisera) is also interestingly depicted. He lies in a rather eff...

Egon Schiele, 'Dead Mother', 1910

  My eye is drawn to the hand. Those long, bony fingers are so characteristic of Schiele but here they are particularly skeletal and deathly – the veins seem to have been injected with poison. And they are a warning right in the foreground of the painting that keeps the viewer at bay as an outsider to this incredibly intimate relationship between mother and child, and sets the tone of death and mortality which hangs over the whole image. The mother cradles her child in a womb-like shroud, alluding to childbirth and the death of the mother explained in the title. She seems desperate to feel that bodily connection with her child, highlighted by the emphasis on her craned neck as she tries to connect to the baby. There is a clear link between the mother’s bent neck and the child’s bent neck, again emphasising their longing to be with each other. However, the darkness around the child is almost like ropes, with flecks of white in the painting making it look as though the darkness is wo...