Skip to main content

Anthony Van Dyck, 'Ecce Homo', 1621-7

 

It is difficult for the eye to decipher the true subject of this work. Most critics agree that Van Dyck depicts an Ecce Homo, the Latin words with which Pontius Pilate presented Christ, although others prefer to label it as a Man of Sorrows. Certainly the pain, emotion, resolution and turmoil is visible in both Christ's features and his body language. Like many artists Van Dyck seems attracted to this subject displaying deep suffering. The choice of a three-quarter length, turned profile allows the artist to exploit the stark nudity of Christ against a dark background. The flesh is dimpled, the arms veined and muscled, with flecks of blue in the canvas to give a human touch to Christ. The hands of Christ are brought in front of him, tied to show his capture and torment. A single tear drops down his deeply shadowed face, the twisting profile allowing Van Dyck to present heightened emotion. The light from his crown of thorns is all that pierces the darkness, echoed by the heavenly glow that seems to emanate from his pale skin. 

But there is another figure in this painting, difficult to see on the reproduction. In the right corner a Sub-Saharan African soldier spreads the royal robe behind Christ's back in a mocking gesture. His grinning face is disconcerting in the midst of the suffering of Christ, coupled with his twinkling eye. The contrast of the light and dark skin has been made very clear by the artist, as the black soldier is almost lost to the darkness of the canvas background completely. In this painting whiteness seemingly connotes power, incorporating seventeenth century racial views into the scene and ideas that still ring true today. Despite some sort of tear shape that falls from the eye of the black soldier mirroring Christ, recent examination of the painting has determined that this is a splash mark on the varnish. These details are much easier for the eye to digest in person at the Barber Institute in Birmingham. 

The painting is said to have come from the Palazzo Balbi in Genoa. Van Dyck certainly spent several years in Italy collecting works by fellow masters, and amassed a small but well focused collection. He certainly owned one religious subject by Titian, which happened to also be an Ecce Homo. However he recorded a number of different versions of the subject in his Italian Sketchbook, which perhaps shows why these piece is so emotionally evocative. A Man of Sorrows also by the artist is held in the Courtauld collection and has been suggested by Count Seilern as a modello for the later work in Birmingham. The rendering of both anatomy and drapery certainly is more developed and finished than the painting Seilern refers to. The drooping, weighty head of Christ coupled with the unsettling nature of the soldier come together in this particular piece for added emotional power.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Cellini, 'Perseus with the Head of Medusa', 1545-1554

  My eye is immediately drawn to the head of Medusa. At first glance it looks gruesome, as though Cellini has captured the moment just after the head has been decapitated, and it oozes blood and bodily matter. However the viewer then notices the similarity between that and Medusa's hair. Maybe it is just her hair after all. Cellini has cleverly enticed the viewer in here, to take a closer look and therefore involved them in the sculpture as a whole. Once they do come closer, they begin to notice other things such as the similarity between Perseus' hair and Medusa's snakes. Hero and monster are not so separate. Even the features of their faces are very similar. Perhaps Cellini wants to suggest that evil can often wear the mask of good. Or he could even be implying that everyone has some evil within them, even the hero Perseus.  One of the good things about sculpture is that the viewer is able to walk around it, and fully immerse themselves in the piece. Cellini has used this...

Guccio di Mannaia, 'Chalice for Pope Nicholas IV', 13th century

  As the only work remaining of Sienese goldsmith Guccio di Mannaia, the chalice he created for Pope Nicholas IV in the late thirteenth century is an incredibly important work of art. Not only does it highlight the rich, opulent nature of papal commissions, but it proves the talent of Sienese goldsmiths and their resulting influence on painters and sculptors of the period. The chalice is innovative in shape and form, but it is striking first and foremost through the use of gold. It is an object that deserves to be viewed in the flesh, because of its reflective and therefore mimetic potential – like a bronze sculpture it is activated by light and should be experienced in the round as a three-dimensional, highly decorated art object. Its complicated design features an almost architectonic base, star-like as it spills out towards the viewer. The base builds up into the stem of the chalice which is decorated with an array of enamelled plaques featuring saints, prophets, angels and furt...

Artemisia Gentileschi, 'Jael and Sisera', c.1620

  My eye firstly notices the hand wielding the hammer above the unsuspecting man's head. Gentileschi is depicting a new and particularly horrible kind of weapon here instead of the huge sword she gave Judith to slice Holofernes' head off in 1620. The tent peg seems all the more violent, especially as the viewer is looking at the split second before the deed has been committed. Moreover, the gaze of the women (Jael) is focused and calm, making the piece seem unnerving. This is not a moment of hesitation but a snapshot of action - the woman has made up her mind and will commit to this murder. The viewer can only imagine how Gentileschi would have depicted the bloody aftermath, in her usual violent and tenebristic way. The fact that the artist has signed her name in the tomb-like stone above the man is significant - she is signing his life away in this painting, sending him swiftly to the grave.  The body of the man (Sisera) is also interestingly depicted. He lies in a rather eff...