Skip to main content

Andrew Wyeth, 'Trodden Weed', 1951

 

Trodden Weed is described as a self portrait, but with the unusually steep perspective, the primary subject, that is, the human figure, is completely detached from the scene. Instead, the eye is forced to focus on a pair of boots that seemingly do not belong to the twentieth century. Nor does this kind of painting; most artists were striving towards a more abstract form, but here the figure treads the earth of realism. 

The boots were given to Wyeth as a gift, originally belonging to the illustrator Howard Pyle. After undergoing a difficult operation to remove part of his lung that rendered one of his arms effectively useless, Wyeth recovered by walking the hills surrounding Chadds Ford as the painting depicts. Knowing this biographical information, clearly the painting can be read through the lens of the transience of life - the dark colour palette, the movement away from the light, and the claustrophobic perspective. But perhaps there is also something stoic about the piece, a painting about survival. Though he may be faceless, there is a sense of speed and movement to our hero, aided by the fluttering coat and complex rendering of the earth itself. Wyeth certainly was not intending to give up painting. 

The most interesting part of Trodden Weed is the choice of medium. Wyeth believed tempera was the pinnacle of the media he used. The natural quality that tempera produced reminded him of the dry mud in the Brandywine river valley. The process appealed to him too, building up the layers of tempera just as 'the way the earth itself was built'. There is a tactile sense to the earth in this depiction, coupled with the detailed folding of the boots. Tempera was therefore the clearest way Wyeth could portray his interest in realism. 

Andrew Wyeth is a thorn in the side of critics. Not only does he buck the artistic trends of the time, not fitting neatly into the canon perpetuated by art historians, but he also traverses the categories of art history. There is realism in his works, but also surrealism. Sometimes there can be abstraction. Although he draws on the landscapes of his home, Wyeth does not stick to one subject matter. He has been misunderstood because his style has been considered 'unfashionable'. But if we care to toss the limiting 'schools' of art history aside, we can uncover artists like Wyeth, who may not conform, but are just as important and innovative. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mark Rothko, 'Light Red over Black', 1957

  My eye is not drawn to the painting itself but the title of the painting, 'Light Red Over Black'. We would automatically think that the black is on top of a red background, but Rothko has flipped this around, subverting the title just like he subverting the meaning of what it was to be an artist and what Art actually was. During this time, art was going through rapid changes, with abstract expressionism coming into full force (Rothko, Pollock). But Rothko showed that all this change was for the good, even if for him, it was short lived.  The colour red in this painting is searing and the black struggles to fully cover this velvety border, especially at the bottom of the canvas. Unlike the black squares which have a hazy quality to their edges, the red is clear and impregnable. It is hard to figure out what this represents - the Tate has suggested a window perhaps, but if it is a window then what are we looking out into? Perhaps it is night, or perhaps the viewer is catching ...

Egon Schiele, 'Dead Mother', 1910

  My eye is drawn to the hand. Those long, bony fingers are so characteristic of Schiele but here they are particularly skeletal and deathly – the veins seem to have been injected with poison. And they are a warning right in the foreground of the painting that keeps the viewer at bay as an outsider to this incredibly intimate relationship between mother and child, and sets the tone of death and mortality which hangs over the whole image. The mother cradles her child in a womb-like shroud, alluding to childbirth and the death of the mother explained in the title. She seems desperate to feel that bodily connection with her child, highlighted by the emphasis on her craned neck as she tries to connect to the baby. There is a clear link between the mother’s bent neck and the child’s bent neck, again emphasising their longing to be with each other. However, the darkness around the child is almost like ropes, with flecks of white in the painting making it look as though the darkness is wo...

Artemisia Gentileschi, 'Jael and Sisera', c.1620

  My eye firstly notices the hand wielding the hammer above the unsuspecting man's head. Gentileschi is depicting a new and particularly horrible kind of weapon here instead of the huge sword she gave Judith to slice Holofernes' head off in 1620. The tent peg seems all the more violent, especially as the viewer is looking at the split second before the deed has been committed. Moreover, the gaze of the women (Jael) is focused and calm, making the piece seem unnerving. This is not a moment of hesitation but a snapshot of action - the woman has made up her mind and will commit to this murder. The viewer can only imagine how Gentileschi would have depicted the bloody aftermath, in her usual violent and tenebristic way. The fact that the artist has signed her name in the tomb-like stone above the man is significant - she is signing his life away in this painting, sending him swiftly to the grave.  The body of the man (Sisera) is also interestingly depicted. He lies in a rather eff...