Skip to main content

Anton Losenko, 'Farewell of Hector and Andromache', 1773

 


After the introduction of Classical training through teaching at Russia's Academy of Arts opening in 1764, works such as Losenko's Farewell of Hector and Andromache began to be produced, imitating Western modes. The eye is instantly aware of the Classical lighting with which the artist has imbued this piece, a heroic glow illuminating the contrapposto stance of Hector who flings his outstretched arm upwards towards darkening clouds. Dressed in neoclassical attire, even one who is less familiar with the story can grasp the military connotations of the event, as Hector prepares for battle. Clearly, the storm brewing is a threatening symbol, implying his resulting death after the events depicted in this scene. Hector's tilted face is one of anguish and torment, his brow furrowed, his expression pained and confused. Beside him his wife, clutching their infant son, is slightly more contained in her emotions. Perhaps Losenko has relegated the emotional strength of the piece solely to the male hero. But including Andromache in the glorious lighting shows Losenko has not completely neglected her importance in the story. Similarly to Hector's rippling cloak, Andromache's heavy draperies present an opportunity for the artist to show off his technical skill, whilst also using her maternal embrace of her son to add sentimental weight to the narrative. 

Losenko was heralded as the 'new Raphael' in Russia, and pioneering history painting in this otherwise backwards community of native artists. Without any form of artistic training, the professional artist did not exist in Russia as it did in Europe, and 'artists' were icon painters if nothing else. Heavy reliance on foreign artists produced royal portraiture, until Catherine the Great in the mid eighteenth century saw the need to create a native, national style for the Russian Empire. Thus, the Academy was born, and artist such as Losenko rose to prominence through their skill in emulating the West and antiquity. The subject chosen was already popular in Europe and would continue to be, represented by the works of Antonio Zucchi and David. Training at Russia's Academy of Arts followed French models, for instance drawing from live models. The stance of Hector could easily have been posed by a life model in the training studios of Russia's Academy. 

Striking in the piece is Losenko's capacity for detail. The Doric columns with, according to Vitrivius,  connotations of masculine strength, are topped by triptychs, metopes and relief work featuring heraldic, military imagery. This circular stage set behind the figures serves to push them forward towards the viewer's space, however Losenko is careful to leave enough room at the front of the composition so as not to overwhelm the viewer's eye. Compositionally therefore, this piece is one of harmony and balance. This would become an issue for subsequent Russian paintings also depicting narrative and biblical scenes, such as the overblown Romanticism of Karl Briullov and Fydor Bruni. The secondary figures relegated to the shadows in Losenko's work echo the curve of the classical architecture, again enticing the viewer to analyse the painting more closely. Each time you look, there's another detail to be discovered, from the rearing horse in the background to the figure struggling under the weight of Hector's shield close to the edge of the picture plane. It is a painting that merits close analysis and highlights how Losenko was emulating the best of what European painting had to offer. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Cellini, 'Perseus with the Head of Medusa', 1545-1554

  My eye is immediately drawn to the head of Medusa. At first glance it looks gruesome, as though Cellini has captured the moment just after the head has been decapitated, and it oozes blood and bodily matter. However the viewer then notices the similarity between that and Medusa's hair. Maybe it is just her hair after all. Cellini has cleverly enticed the viewer in here, to take a closer look and therefore involved them in the sculpture as a whole. Once they do come closer, they begin to notice other things such as the similarity between Perseus' hair and Medusa's snakes. Hero and monster are not so separate. Even the features of their faces are very similar. Perhaps Cellini wants to suggest that evil can often wear the mask of good. Or he could even be implying that everyone has some evil within them, even the hero Perseus.  One of the good things about sculpture is that the viewer is able to walk around it, and fully immerse themselves in the piece. Cellini has used this...

Guccio di Mannaia, 'Chalice for Pope Nicholas IV', 13th century

  As the only work remaining of Sienese goldsmith Guccio di Mannaia, the chalice he created for Pope Nicholas IV in the late thirteenth century is an incredibly important work of art. Not only does it highlight the rich, opulent nature of papal commissions, but it proves the talent of Sienese goldsmiths and their resulting influence on painters and sculptors of the period. The chalice is innovative in shape and form, but it is striking first and foremost through the use of gold. It is an object that deserves to be viewed in the flesh, because of its reflective and therefore mimetic potential – like a bronze sculpture it is activated by light and should be experienced in the round as a three-dimensional, highly decorated art object. Its complicated design features an almost architectonic base, star-like as it spills out towards the viewer. The base builds up into the stem of the chalice which is decorated with an array of enamelled plaques featuring saints, prophets, angels and furt...

Artemisia Gentileschi, 'Jael and Sisera', c.1620

  My eye firstly notices the hand wielding the hammer above the unsuspecting man's head. Gentileschi is depicting a new and particularly horrible kind of weapon here instead of the huge sword she gave Judith to slice Holofernes' head off in 1620. The tent peg seems all the more violent, especially as the viewer is looking at the split second before the deed has been committed. Moreover, the gaze of the women (Jael) is focused and calm, making the piece seem unnerving. This is not a moment of hesitation but a snapshot of action - the woman has made up her mind and will commit to this murder. The viewer can only imagine how Gentileschi would have depicted the bloody aftermath, in her usual violent and tenebristic way. The fact that the artist has signed her name in the tomb-like stone above the man is significant - she is signing his life away in this painting, sending him swiftly to the grave.  The body of the man (Sisera) is also interestingly depicted. He lies in a rather eff...