Skip to main content

Ilya Repin, 'Woman with a Dagger', 1875



Although the eye within the canvas does not acknowledge the viewer, the presence of this figure is enough to command anyone's attention. The intensity of the woman's gaze fits into the pictorial scene of Sadko and the Underwater Kingdom for which this painting is a study. This complicated, Orientalising piece based on a folkloric tale was not one that Ilya Repin was truly satisfied with, but was well regarded by contemporaries. Even in this isolated study the viewer quickly realises a mythologising subject, with illusionistic hues of blue melting into the background that could reference the underwater scene of the final painting. Repin also used the figure for a ceramic design, highlighting his reuse of a figural type both in different contexts and media. The figure could equally be based on the famous Ukrainian beauty Sophia Dragomirova, with her noticeable thick eyebrows and dark hair. Repin painted Sophia's portrait, but the connection to this study is only speculative. 

Producing a dagger, this female figure could slot into any feminist canon of art history. With her dress opening at her heart, it emphasises the underlying capacity for violence this woman holds. She is seemingly dressed like a priestess and could easily connote a sorceress or an enchantress, such as Medea. Her caressing of the dagger furthers this connection. At this point in artistic Britain, for instance, such female figures were popularly rendered, for example Frederick Sandy's portrayal of Medea with her thick dark hair and white costume that recall this work of Repin. The artist did in fact travel to London, and witnessed exhibitions at the Royal Academy, so would have been familiar with these Western types. However in his painting, the female figure is no femme fatale but with her golden headdress she becomes a symbol of power. The quick, confident brushstrokes of the young Repin produce a shimmering effect to the gold, which is picked up in flecks of white highlights in the figure's costume. Her pose is one of commandment, of strength and superiority. Looking onwards to an unknown location, she is akin to Classicising sculptures of Roman emperors, and even prefigures propaganda of the Soviet era where the idea of thoughtfully looking into the distance became a gesture of intellect, power and domination. 

The actual features of the figure here are quite androgenous, with thick eyebrows, a strong jaw, down turned lips and a Acquiline nose. This links to the overtly masculine pose with its accompanying connotations of strength. Equally the quickness of brushstroke render the figure's hair in thick tendrils, almost recalling the snakes of Medusa's head. However this is where Repin's interest in the Orientalising genre comes to the surface. By subverting the traditional Western notions of beauty - light skin and light hair - perhaps this piece is a subtle comment on Repin's heritage. He was after all not a Russian artist, but was born and raised in Ukraine, learning the ways of icon painting there. Subsequently adopted as 'Russia's greatest realist' he was always careful to subtly reference his Ukrainian and folkloric roots. Repin recasts the Western notions of beauty, whilst seemingly conflating Orientalist modes with a distinct attitude to brushwork and facture, in this study for his wider artistic endeavours. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Cellini, 'Perseus with the Head of Medusa', 1545-1554

  My eye is immediately drawn to the head of Medusa. At first glance it looks gruesome, as though Cellini has captured the moment just after the head has been decapitated, and it oozes blood and bodily matter. However the viewer then notices the similarity between that and Medusa's hair. Maybe it is just her hair after all. Cellini has cleverly enticed the viewer in here, to take a closer look and therefore involved them in the sculpture as a whole. Once they do come closer, they begin to notice other things such as the similarity between Perseus' hair and Medusa's snakes. Hero and monster are not so separate. Even the features of their faces are very similar. Perhaps Cellini wants to suggest that evil can often wear the mask of good. Or he could even be implying that everyone has some evil within them, even the hero Perseus.  One of the good things about sculpture is that the viewer is able to walk around it, and fully immerse themselves in the piece. Cellini has used this...
Post a Comment
Read more

Guccio di Mannaia, 'Chalice for Pope Nicholas IV', 13th century

  As the only work remaining of Sienese goldsmith Guccio di Mannaia, the chalice he created for Pope Nicholas IV in the late thirteenth century is an incredibly important work of art. Not only does it highlight the rich, opulent nature of papal commissions, but it proves the talent of Sienese goldsmiths and their resulting influence on painters and sculptors of the period. The chalice is innovative in shape and form, but it is striking first and foremost through the use of gold. It is an object that deserves to be viewed in the flesh, because of its reflective and therefore mimetic potential – like a bronze sculpture it is activated by light and should be experienced in the round as a three-dimensional, highly decorated art object. Its complicated design features an almost architectonic base, star-like as it spills out towards the viewer. The base builds up into the stem of the chalice which is decorated with an array of enamelled plaques featuring saints, prophets, angels and furt...
Post a Comment
Read more

Artemisia Gentileschi, 'Jael and Sisera', c.1620

  My eye firstly notices the hand wielding the hammer above the unsuspecting man's head. Gentileschi is depicting a new and particularly horrible kind of weapon here instead of the huge sword she gave Judith to slice Holofernes' head off in 1620. The tent peg seems all the more violent, especially as the viewer is looking at the split second before the deed has been committed. Moreover, the gaze of the women (Jael) is focused and calm, making the piece seem unnerving. This is not a moment of hesitation but a snapshot of action - the woman has made up her mind and will commit to this murder. The viewer can only imagine how Gentileschi would have depicted the bloody aftermath, in her usual violent and tenebristic way. The fact that the artist has signed her name in the tomb-like stone above the man is significant - she is signing his life away in this painting, sending him swiftly to the grave.  The body of the man (Sisera) is also interestingly depicted. He lies in a rather eff...
Post a Comment
Read more