Skip to main content

Giotto(?), 'Dream of Pope Innocent', c1295-9

 


Positioned on the north wall of the nave in the Upper Church of San Francesco at Assisi, the narrative cycles depicting the life and deeds of Saint Francis encircle the viewer in a clockwise motion. The cycle is highly discussed in the history of art, particularly through the lens of attribution which continues to be debated. Perhaps it was the young Giotto, the most likely candidate, or perhaps it was a Roman master, given the pervasion of Roman architecture and iconography in the scenes. Some writers prefer to sit on the fence, attributing the frescoes to the 'Master of Saint Francis'. These debates were best outlined in Alastair Smart's 'The Assisi Problem'. Nevertheless, the artist knits together a complicated array of scenes both through narrative and wider theological concepts. They concern the early life of Saint Francis, the formation of the Order, his works and good deeds, his death, his swift canonisation and conclude with his posthumous miracles. This particular scene depicts Pope Innocent dreaming of Francis rebuilding the Christian church, quite literally on the left side of the fresco. The dream, as the upcoming scenes depict, would encourage the Pope to issue a Bull in recognition of the Franciscan Order. 

Despite some issues with damp on the top corner of the building, this fresco has survived remarkably well, as has the majority of the Saint Francis cycle positioned on the lower portions of the walls. As mentioned, Saint Francis is depicted propping up a church, here resembling the Lateran Palace in its original form. Weighted orthogonals produced by the ingenious tilted ground plane create the impression of both the monumentality of the building, but also the compression of space, as Francis is literally squashed between the two buildings. However he still manages to hold his own, commanding the space as the protagonist of the fresco cycle. Francis occupies the corner column of the structure, giving essential stability to the building, literally presenting the dream of the Pope who lies next door, in visual form: Francis will be the one to rebuild and hold up the church of Christ. Francis looks up towards the top of the building, his face relaxed, hand on hip to display his confidence, despite supporting the entirety of Christianity with one hand. In this respect, he can also be regarded as imitato Christi, or a second Christ. Saint Francis becomes a pillar of the church in this scene, and interestingly the door of the church is open, already prepared to invite the Franciscan community in. Just one part of the scene shows the ingenuity and skill of the artist(s) who created the fresco cycle. 

This fresco was almost definitely produced before the turn of the century, yet some commentators have referenced the use of proto-perspective in the management of space. Certainly the tilted building is highly unusual, but equally convincing. Within the bed chamber of the Pope, symmetry and cleaner proportions dictate the space. Firstly, it is an incredibly lofty space, having felt so compressed on the outside with the collapsing church. Secondly, the two figures sitting below the sleeping figure of the Pope create symmetry and harmony to the interior scene, whilst directing the eye to the vivid red bed and dreamer. Thirdly, the curtain that wraps around the scene is particularly influential in dictating space, giving an innovative three-dimensionality to the picture plane, whilst also mimicking the slightly curved body of the Pope, head and shoulders raised as though propped up by a pillow. The structure of the Pope's bechamber is open, inviting the spectator to move on to the next scene, which fill form the beginning of the next bay in the architecture at Assisi. The space is innovative, unique and fundamental to understanding not just the origins of the Franciscan Order, but their primary motivations of humility, piety and most importantly brotherhood. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Artemisia Gentileschi, 'Jael and Sisera', c.1620

  My eye firstly notices the hand wielding the hammer above the unsuspecting man's head. Gentileschi is depicting a new and particularly horrible kind of weapon here instead of the huge sword she gave Judith to slice Holofernes' head off in 1620. The tent peg seems all the more violent, especially as the viewer is looking at the split second before the deed has been committed. Moreover, the gaze of the women (Jael) is focused and calm, making the piece seem unnerving. This is not a moment of hesitation but a snapshot of action - the woman has made up her mind and will commit to this murder. The viewer can only imagine how Gentileschi would have depicted the bloody aftermath, in her usual violent and tenebristic way. The fact that the artist has signed her name in the tomb-like stone above the man is significant - she is signing his life away in this painting, sending him swiftly to the grave.  The body of the man (Sisera) is also interestingly depicted. He lies in a rather eff...

Cellini, 'Perseus with the Head of Medusa', 1545-1554

  My eye is immediately drawn to the head of Medusa. At first glance it looks gruesome, as though Cellini has captured the moment just after the head has been decapitated, and it oozes blood and bodily matter. However the viewer then notices the similarity between that and Medusa's hair. Maybe it is just her hair after all. Cellini has cleverly enticed the viewer in here, to take a closer look and therefore involved them in the sculpture as a whole. Once they do come closer, they begin to notice other things such as the similarity between Perseus' hair and Medusa's snakes. Hero and monster are not so separate. Even the features of their faces are very similar. Perhaps Cellini wants to suggest that evil can often wear the mask of good. Or he could even be implying that everyone has some evil within them, even the hero Perseus.  One of the good things about sculpture is that the viewer is able to walk around it, and fully immerse themselves in the piece. Cellini has used this...

John Everett Millais, 'Peace Concluded', 1856

  My eye is drawn to the copy of The Times clutched in the hands of the officer. The white of the figurine on the man's knee and the white of his wife's sleeves all serve to make the white paper stand out even more on the canvas. As the title of the painting suggests, this is about the end of the Crimean War, seemingly depicting a soldier who has just returned home, surrounded by his family, but the mood is perhaps less euphoric than you might expect. The soldier seems somber and weary, and his wife has a look of concern. Although on the surface it seems to be quite a harmonious composition representing a close knit and traditional family, the positioning of the man is odd. It is his wife who takes her place at the apex of the triangular composition, the soldier is reduced to an emasculated role, perhaps an invalid, as suggested by the blanket over his legs. Her face is passive, but not exactly positive. With her arms draped around her husband, she looks posed, dutiful but not...