Skip to main content

Guccio di Mannaia, 'Chalice for Pope Nicholas IV', 13th century

 

As the only work remaining of Sienese goldsmith Guccio di Mannaia, the chalice he created for Pope Nicholas IV in the late thirteenth century is an incredibly important work of art. Not only does it highlight the rich, opulent nature of papal commissions, but it proves the talent of Sienese goldsmiths and their resulting influence on painters and sculptors of the period. The chalice is innovative in shape and form, but it is striking first and foremost through the use of gold. It is an object that deserves to be viewed in the flesh, because of its reflective and therefore mimetic potential – like a bronze sculpture it is activated by light and should be experienced in the round as a three-dimensional, highly decorated art object. Its complicated design features an almost architectonic base, star-like as it spills out towards the viewer. The base builds up into the stem of the chalice which is decorated with an array of enamelled plaques featuring saints, prophets, angels and further divine figures, building up to the remarkably plain cup itself which sits atop the decorative detail.

As a Franciscan chalice – Pope Nicholas IV was the first Franciscan Pope – the amount of rich detail seems contrary to the vows of the Order, promising poverty, chastity and obedience. Yet, the Order had a history of commissioning highly detailed artworks and interior schemes, from the vita panels dedicated to Saint Clare and Saint Francis (who feature prominently on the design here), to the interior of San Francesco, the mother church at Assisi. Saint Francis features on the iconographic program of the chalice, receiving the stigmata to highlight his closeness to Christ. The fact that Francis is depicted in the guise of Christ on a chalice with all its accompanying Eucharistic potential furthers this relationship between Francis and the Redeemer, as well as the power and thaumaturgical credentials of the saint himself. Two inscriptions accompany the array of saints and evangelists, one that names Guccio as the maker of the object and a second that names the papal patron. Therefore, artist and commissioner are slotted into the holy program, imbuing them both with divine, prophetical importance. It is a religious object, it illustrates the power of the divine, but it is also a program of self-promotion and self-aggrandisement for patron and artist.

Guccio’s life and work remain a mystery. Along with papal commissions he produced seals. These included the design that became representative of Siena itself, reproduced by Simone Martini on his Maesta for the Palazzo Pubblico and accompanied by a prayer to the Virgin for protection of Siena as patron saint. Guccio’s work in multiple media clearly had a lasting impact. Equally, his chalice design changed the creation of these objects as the other Mendicant Orders began to adopt similar motifs. Chalices by later Sienese goldsmiths, including Bartolomeo di Tomme and Tondino di Guerrino, are virtual carbon copies of Guccio’s new form. Yet as mentioned, this was a celebration of the individual as much as it was a new and innovative chalice design. Guccio made sure his name was emblazoned on the side of the chalice, but Pope Nicholas IV furthered his claim by requesting a donor portrait on the design. Twinned with his inscription, his authority is furthered. Although donor portraits were becoming more common into the fourteenth century, on a chalice this was highly unusual. Nicholas IV was known for including himself in his commissions including the mosaic apse by Jacopo Torriti in Santa Maria Maggiore where the Pope appears kneeling before the Coronation of the Virgin as a direct, divine intercessor once again. The chalice is therefore innovative in form and composition, in elaborating the careers of Sienese goldsmiths of the late thirteenth century but fundamentally in artistic programs of self-glorification. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

John Everett Millais, 'Peace Concluded', 1856

  My eye is drawn to the copy of The Times clutched in the hands of the officer. The white of the figurine on the man's knee and the white of his wife's sleeves all serve to make the white paper stand out even more on the canvas. As the title of the painting suggests, this is about the end of the Crimean War, seemingly depicting a soldier who has just returned home, surrounded by his family, but the mood is perhaps less euphoric than you might expect. The soldier seems somber and weary, and his wife has a look of concern. Although on the surface it seems to be quite a harmonious composition representing a close knit and traditional family, the positioning of the man is odd. It is his wife who takes her place at the apex of the triangular composition, the soldier is reduced to an emasculated role, perhaps an invalid, as suggested by the blanket over his legs. Her face is passive, but not exactly positive. With her arms draped around her husband, she looks posed, dutiful but not...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ernst Barlach, 'The Avenger', 1914

  On the advent of both the First World War and the artistic movement known as Futurism, Ersnt Barlach cast this work in bronze. The eye picks out an angular, horizontal form, a sense of hurried pace and strong facial features to this work by the German Expressionist artist. This piece is highly interesting when discussed in terms of the artist's oeuvre - Barlach entered the First World War with a clear attitude of patriotism. The sculpture reflects that, as the figure seemingly thrusts forward wielding a sizeable weapon above his head, leading the charge head on. Describing the sculpture as his 'raging Barbarian' it is clear that Barlach wanted to present an emotionally charged figure. Perhaps it is even a self portrait, with Barlach picturing himself as the hero. The artist did in fact serve briefly as an infantry officer. However realisation soon dawned and patriotism quickly dwindled. All of Barlach's sculptures from this point onward are influenced by the horror an...
Post a Comment
Read more

Egon Schiele, 'Dead Mother', 1910

  My eye is drawn to the hand. Those long, bony fingers are so characteristic of Schiele but here they are particularly skeletal and deathly – the veins seem to have been injected with poison. And they are a warning right in the foreground of the painting that keeps the viewer at bay as an outsider to this incredibly intimate relationship between mother and child, and sets the tone of death and mortality which hangs over the whole image. The mother cradles her child in a womb-like shroud, alluding to childbirth and the death of the mother explained in the title. She seems desperate to feel that bodily connection with her child, highlighted by the emphasis on her craned neck as she tries to connect to the baby. There is a clear link between the mother’s bent neck and the child’s bent neck, again emphasising their longing to be with each other. However, the darkness around the child is almost like ropes, with flecks of white in the painting making it look as though the darkness is wo...
Post a Comment
Read more