Skip to main content

Carlo Crivelli, 'Thomas Aquinas', 1476

 


The amount of detail contained in the small panel of St Thomas Aquinas is hard for the eye to quantify. It is even more staggering when a viewer realises that this is but one section of the so-called Demidoff Altarpiece, produced by Crivelli in 1476 for the church of Ascoli Piceno. As a whole, the altarpiece includes complex tracery and gold work in the International Gothic style, the latter of which is repeated on the gold leaf backgrounds that saints sit upon, through both tooling and gilding methods. The figure of Thomas Aquinas, ageing and dressed in a Dominican habit, is positioned on the right-hand side of the altarpiece's upper tier. He looks to the left, betraying his position on the edge of the panel, as he gazes towards the figure of St Stephen. Although he does not open his mouth, his eyeline suggests dialogue. Directional gazes, coupled with illusionistic detail, are constantly employed by Crivelli to bridge the gap between reality and the divine. 

Aquinas' inquisitive gaze betrays his intellect, as does the book he holds. His fingers which press against the pages of unreadable pseudo-scripture with sensitivity, tactility and convincing realism, are thin, bony and grasping. The skin pulls at the thumb as it stretches to take the weight of the book, whilst the index finger prizes the pages apart. The book itself seems worn and well used, almost recalling the aged skin of the scholar himself. There is also immediacy and presence, as Aquinas takes a viewer through the book in his hands in real time. This is furthered by the realistic pressure of the fingers on the pages. The parchment is gathered in between the second and third finger, as we witness the making of a new crease by Aquinas' hand, and by extension the hand of the artist, Crivelli. Realism stretches beyond the weighty book in the saint's left hand, however, for in his right he grasps a model of the church in which the altarpiece is housed. The door is open, inviting the devout to enter and as if to confirm this, Crivelli has placed figures peering out from the interior darkness. Not only does this serve to highlight the immense level of detail in Crivelli's panel, yet it intrigues the viewer as to what lies beyond. Open doors had been used as a motif in devotional works since the thirteenth century, to reference the realm beyond and the possibilities of reaching heaven. The open door could also here have a more immediate religious purpose, not only reflecting the movements of those who would have entered the church to view this altarpiece, but welcoming the devout into the house of the lord through the open doorway. Crivelli depicts the church aged and worn, with moss growing from its bricks and discolouration on its exterior facade. There is a certain element of the passing of time in the way Crivelli has depicted the church, slowly becoming colonised by natural forces.

Even in one panel of the Demidoff Altarpiece, illusion and reality are the driving forces, channelled through a spiritual lens to encourage devotion from the viewer. As the exhibition at the Ikon Gallery in Birmingham in 2022 proved, Crivelli shattered the levels of sacred and secular, both through imagery but also through a use of materials. The Demidoff Altarpiece is particularly well known for its depiction of St Peter, who's keys are three-dimensional, modelled in gesso so that they protrude off the flat panel and push into a viewer's space. A similar technique, yet on a smaller scale, was used for Aquinas' halo, matching the other saints on the panel. Crivelli's combination of material manipulation with trompe l'oeil successfully deceives the viewer's eye. Yet, every panel, as the depiction of Aquinas proves, maintains its religious velocity both to a fifteenth century viewer in Ascoli Piceno, and a twenty-first audience in the decontextualised museal display today. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Artemisia Gentileschi, 'Jael and Sisera', c.1620

  My eye firstly notices the hand wielding the hammer above the unsuspecting man's head. Gentileschi is depicting a new and particularly horrible kind of weapon here instead of the huge sword she gave Judith to slice Holofernes' head off in 1620. The tent peg seems all the more violent, especially as the viewer is looking at the split second before the deed has been committed. Moreover, the gaze of the women (Jael) is focused and calm, making the piece seem unnerving. This is not a moment of hesitation but a snapshot of action - the woman has made up her mind and will commit to this murder. The viewer can only imagine how Gentileschi would have depicted the bloody aftermath, in her usual violent and tenebristic way. The fact that the artist has signed her name in the tomb-like stone above the man is significant - she is signing his life away in this painting, sending him swiftly to the grave.  The body of the man (Sisera) is also interestingly depicted. He lies in a rather eff...

Cellini, 'Perseus with the Head of Medusa', 1545-1554

  My eye is immediately drawn to the head of Medusa. At first glance it looks gruesome, as though Cellini has captured the moment just after the head has been decapitated, and it oozes blood and bodily matter. However the viewer then notices the similarity between that and Medusa's hair. Maybe it is just her hair after all. Cellini has cleverly enticed the viewer in here, to take a closer look and therefore involved them in the sculpture as a whole. Once they do come closer, they begin to notice other things such as the similarity between Perseus' hair and Medusa's snakes. Hero and monster are not so separate. Even the features of their faces are very similar. Perhaps Cellini wants to suggest that evil can often wear the mask of good. Or he could even be implying that everyone has some evil within them, even the hero Perseus.  One of the good things about sculpture is that the viewer is able to walk around it, and fully immerse themselves in the piece. Cellini has used this...

John Everett Millais, 'Peace Concluded', 1856

  My eye is drawn to the copy of The Times clutched in the hands of the officer. The white of the figurine on the man's knee and the white of his wife's sleeves all serve to make the white paper stand out even more on the canvas. As the title of the painting suggests, this is about the end of the Crimean War, seemingly depicting a soldier who has just returned home, surrounded by his family, but the mood is perhaps less euphoric than you might expect. The soldier seems somber and weary, and his wife has a look of concern. Although on the surface it seems to be quite a harmonious composition representing a close knit and traditional family, the positioning of the man is odd. It is his wife who takes her place at the apex of the triangular composition, the soldier is reduced to an emasculated role, perhaps an invalid, as suggested by the blanket over his legs. Her face is passive, but not exactly positive. With her arms draped around her husband, she looks posed, dutiful but not...