Skip to main content

Evelyn De Morgan, 'Study for Earthbound', c.1897

 


Evelyn De Morgan constructed her chalk and pencil study from a richly coloured, highly detailed oil on canvas she called Earthbound. Here, a grasping king swathed in orange and pinpricks of gold attempts to desperately claw at the last of his coins, whilst an angelic being swoops over him. In the distance, a lone figure bathed in light gestures up towards the ombre heavens, in an indication of the underlying religiosity of De Morgan's oil painting. None of this becomes evident, however, from her chalk and pencil study of two reclining figures. What is the purpose of exploring these preparatory sketches? Why are they important or useful?

In the oil painting, De Morgan's miserly king is noticeably male, from his bushy grey hair and beard. In the chalk study, the artist has chosen a female figure in both instances, to work out her final composition, firstly in the nude before layering the draperies onto the figure. It highlights the constraints of the nineteenth century female artist, who had access to female modes but rarely nude men. More importantly however, it shows the adaptability of De Morgan - she used men and women interchangeably in her paintings and drawings. In actual fact, gender was of less importance to her, and it is often difficult to identify the sex of her figures. Instead of focusing on the specifics of male and female, De Morgan explored colour, form, composition and the belief in the finished work of art as an aesthetic product. She meticulously prepared her canvases, working out each stage and preparing multiple drawings for one work, from single body parts to full figures as depicted here. De Morgan's apparent disregard of gender is further evidenced by her favouring of Italian Alessandro di Marco, as a model for both male and female subjects. He was used for the flying Boreas in De Morgan's Boreas and Oreithyia, yet appears much more androgynous in Blindness and Cupidity Chasing Joy from the City as a crowned, draped figure with one outstretched arm and a cornucopia of riches tucked under the other. 

Through an exploration of preparatory work, one immediately senses the hand of De Morgan. The strokes of chalk and pastel are tactile and immediate, giving a freshness to the line which is less apparent in a finished oil painting, as colour begins to take over. Equally, preparatory work can be used as evidence of strong, successful training in drawing. De Morgan had been taught at the progressive Slade School of Art in the early 1870s and took classes in anatomy to further her knowledge of the human body. The pose she chooses for this Study for Earthbound is complex - a reclining figure with crossed legs and outstretched arms, the head tilted down so that the face remains mostly in shadow. The artist has to maintain the proportions of the body accurately, depict the extremities of the hands and feet with realism, whilst giving only a hint of the figure's facial features. De Morgan supplemented her artistic training with visits to Italy, exploring the drawings of Renaissance artists both there and closer to home, for example at the British Museum. Building up a repertoire of sources, she could enhance her own skills. De Morgan certainly valued drawing as much as she appreciated her oils, choosing them for particular exhibitions and even experimenting with materials, as her eighteen exquisite gold drawings from the middle part of her career suggest. Despite their fragility and the concessions that must be made to exhibit them, preparatory drawings should be displayed and should be treated on the same level as 'finished' works of art. It is fascinating to uncover the processes, techniques and methods of artists, and the steps they took to work up finished designs. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Cellini, 'Perseus with the Head of Medusa', 1545-1554

  My eye is immediately drawn to the head of Medusa. At first glance it looks gruesome, as though Cellini has captured the moment just after the head has been decapitated, and it oozes blood and bodily matter. However the viewer then notices the similarity between that and Medusa's hair. Maybe it is just her hair after all. Cellini has cleverly enticed the viewer in here, to take a closer look and therefore involved them in the sculpture as a whole. Once they do come closer, they begin to notice other things such as the similarity between Perseus' hair and Medusa's snakes. Hero and monster are not so separate. Even the features of their faces are very similar. Perhaps Cellini wants to suggest that evil can often wear the mask of good. Or he could even be implying that everyone has some evil within them, even the hero Perseus.  One of the good things about sculpture is that the viewer is able to walk around it, and fully immerse themselves in the piece. Cellini has used this...

Guccio di Mannaia, 'Chalice for Pope Nicholas IV', 13th century

  As the only work remaining of Sienese goldsmith Guccio di Mannaia, the chalice he created for Pope Nicholas IV in the late thirteenth century is an incredibly important work of art. Not only does it highlight the rich, opulent nature of papal commissions, but it proves the talent of Sienese goldsmiths and their resulting influence on painters and sculptors of the period. The chalice is innovative in shape and form, but it is striking first and foremost through the use of gold. It is an object that deserves to be viewed in the flesh, because of its reflective and therefore mimetic potential – like a bronze sculpture it is activated by light and should be experienced in the round as a three-dimensional, highly decorated art object. Its complicated design features an almost architectonic base, star-like as it spills out towards the viewer. The base builds up into the stem of the chalice which is decorated with an array of enamelled plaques featuring saints, prophets, angels and furt...

Marianne von Werekin, 'Sunrise', 1920

  An endless line of men that tug the rope of a small boat soon disappear into murky, burning red waters beyond. Colour is fantastical, mystical and otherworldly, producing an atmosphere far from reality. This is the Symbolist work of Marianne von Werefkin, part of the German Expressionists that worked in Munich from the 1910s. A movement so often dominated by the male names of the time – Kandinsky especially – Werefkin was a vital participant, expanding the range of art produced and displayed, complementing her work with art theory and written sources, as well as creating her own Salon upon her arrival in Munich. It is easy to get lost in biography with a piece such as this. Wasted, human potential seems to be at the heart of this work, signalled by the endless line of men pushing forward towards the edge of the picture plane. There is a sense of struggle and a universality to the suffering through the portrayal of faceless men in similar blue tones. Looking at the date produced o...