Skip to main content

A.J. Davies, 'Virgin and Child with Angels', 1938


It is the continued irony of stained glass that despite its public nature in churches around the world, it is still an art form that is neglected in exhibitions and critical scholarship. It is not art available to the public eye. Admittedly, displaying stained glass comes with its difficulties - works are created for their chosen spiritual or secular spaces, and they are not designed to be moved, whilst accompanying archival material is not always abundant. However, there is little excuse to be made for such a lack of scholarship on stained glass, from any exploration of larger London firms such as Lowndes and Drury, to decentralised narratives of art history which detail the schools around Birmingham or Manchester, to include specific artists. One such practitioner was A.J. Davies, whose window in Claverly Church, Shropshire, is an intriguing example of his later style. 

Davies' window is complex, yet three main layers can be identified. The perspective is stacked, recalling many Pre-Raphaelite designs from a century earlier where layers came to represent the boundaries between earthly and heavenly realms. In his window, however, Davies has blurred the distinction. At the base lies the 'earthly' realm, defined by a use of heraldry - this is a memorial window, as the inscription below the coat of arms details. However, these heraldic devices are almost being colonised by the luxurious floral motifs that sit at the window's base, growing up into the realm of the angels and Virgin and Child, thus implying the acceptance of the deceased into the realm of heaven. The rich blues, reds and greens accompanying the floral imagery furthers these notions of paradise and heaven. In the centre of the window are three figures - Mother and Child flanked by angels, where Davies can show off his skill at rendering a tenderness and individuality of angels through gesture and facial features. Mary, meanwhile, pushes her child up close to her own face, her whole body bending inwards as if to be as close to her son as possible. For a devout viewer who understood the foreshadowing of this imagery, it would be all the more emotional. In places, Davies has kept colour traditional, including the ultramarine blue of the Virgin's cloak, however he has experimented in the bright, Pre-Raphaelite reds and blues for his angels. Their wings are particularly striking, again slightly different and acting almost as a protective frame around both the angels themselves and the Virgin and Child occupying the central panel. The very top of the window could be interpreted as an abstract representation of God, raining light down upon the heavenly figures and by extension, the dedication to Laura who died in 1933. It is interesting that Davies has chosen to depict golden rays in the inherently illuminated material of stained glass. 

Davies was known for pioneering the Bromsgrove Guild, a lesser-known stained glass company in Birmingham at the turn of the century. Often hidden behind the larger and more successful work produced by students and staff at the Birmingham Municipal School of Art, the Bromsgrove Guild was nevertheless a prolific company, producing over 260 designs that were distributed throughout British churches. The Guild died with Davies in 1963, further highlighting his influence. Often, it is the names associated with artistic movements that are remembered for their stained glass work - Burne-Jones, for example, and his work for Morris & Co. Yet, stained glass was a complicated medium involving many different hands, the conflating of artistic styles and cooperation between a team of craftsmen. Although it is not often included in artistic monographs, discussions of movements or even the biographies of artists, it should not be reduced to 'craft', 'decoration' or 'design', but elevated to the status of fine art and painting, appreciated for its complexities. The work of A.J. Davies proves the longevity of stained glass, starting out as a student at the Birmingham School, before finding his feet in the Bromsgrove Guild and producing works across Britain which show an eclectic range of subject matter, unique colouration, an interest in lighting and natural imagery.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Cellini, 'Perseus with the Head of Medusa', 1545-1554

  My eye is immediately drawn to the head of Medusa. At first glance it looks gruesome, as though Cellini has captured the moment just after the head has been decapitated, and it oozes blood and bodily matter. However the viewer then notices the similarity between that and Medusa's hair. Maybe it is just her hair after all. Cellini has cleverly enticed the viewer in here, to take a closer look and therefore involved them in the sculpture as a whole. Once they do come closer, they begin to notice other things such as the similarity between Perseus' hair and Medusa's snakes. Hero and monster are not so separate. Even the features of their faces are very similar. Perhaps Cellini wants to suggest that evil can often wear the mask of good. Or he could even be implying that everyone has some evil within them, even the hero Perseus.  One of the good things about sculpture is that the viewer is able to walk around it, and fully immerse themselves in the piece. Cellini has used this...

Artemisia Gentileschi, 'Jael and Sisera', c.1620

  My eye firstly notices the hand wielding the hammer above the unsuspecting man's head. Gentileschi is depicting a new and particularly horrible kind of weapon here instead of the huge sword she gave Judith to slice Holofernes' head off in 1620. The tent peg seems all the more violent, especially as the viewer is looking at the split second before the deed has been committed. Moreover, the gaze of the women (Jael) is focused and calm, making the piece seem unnerving. This is not a moment of hesitation but a snapshot of action - the woman has made up her mind and will commit to this murder. The viewer can only imagine how Gentileschi would have depicted the bloody aftermath, in her usual violent and tenebristic way. The fact that the artist has signed her name in the tomb-like stone above the man is significant - she is signing his life away in this painting, sending him swiftly to the grave.  The body of the man (Sisera) is also interestingly depicted. He lies in a rather eff...

Guccio di Mannaia, 'Chalice for Pope Nicholas IV', 13th century

  As the only work remaining of Sienese goldsmith Guccio di Mannaia, the chalice he created for Pope Nicholas IV in the late thirteenth century is an incredibly important work of art. Not only does it highlight the rich, opulent nature of papal commissions, but it proves the talent of Sienese goldsmiths and their resulting influence on painters and sculptors of the period. The chalice is innovative in shape and form, but it is striking first and foremost through the use of gold. It is an object that deserves to be viewed in the flesh, because of its reflective and therefore mimetic potential – like a bronze sculpture it is activated by light and should be experienced in the round as a three-dimensional, highly decorated art object. Its complicated design features an almost architectonic base, star-like as it spills out towards the viewer. The base builds up into the stem of the chalice which is decorated with an array of enamelled plaques featuring saints, prophets, angels and furt...