Skip to main content

Christopher Wool, 'Minor Mishap', 2001

 


Christopher Wool's Minor Mishap is a huge, abstract work (274.3 x 182.9cm) made up of only two colours, yet it joins a long lineage of Abstract Expressionist producers, which harks all the way back to 1950s New York. Wool's recent, impressive performance on the art market further proves that this movement has not really waned in popularity with collectors, and continues to be a source of artistic inspiration globally. 

The messiness, harshness and perhaps even violence of Wool's work may reference de Kooning, whilst the simplicity yet vibrancy of colours recalls Rothko's abstract canvases - admittedly, however, Rothko's linearity is most definitely abandoned by Wool. The artist's ink application, meanwhile, can be connected to the art of splash painting, perfected by Pollock and to a lesser extent, Krasner. However, this twenty-first century work is not a complete copy of that style, for Wool is working with silkscreen on linen, where the ink seeps into the fabric. It is therefore a slower, more controlled process than splash painting, witnessed in the bleeding oranges of Wool's work, particularly towards the lower end, as gravity takes control and the orange collects in thick, heavy, downward-moving globules, threatening to push beyond the support completely. Wool does not imitate Pollock and other Abstract Expressionists, but he updates painterly forms and suggests an alternative to splash painting in the modern age. 

Created in 2001, this was a period in Wool's career where he did choose to name works, before he started to settle for the Untitled approach more recently. The alliteration of Minor Mishap makes the title instantly memorable and perhaps even the repeated 'M' sound reflects the merging together of colour, almost mimicking the spilling of ink which Wool illustrates. There is a certain comedy to his title as well: it is only a 'minor' issue that the ink has spilled over the pristine white support. Most importantly, however, the choice of title references the ambiguities of abstract painting generally, and the key paragone at the heart of automatic works, fluctuating between accident and intention. 

Certainly, the artist's abilities (or the movement of the ink itself) threaten to break out of the confines of the linen support, despite the work's all-encompassing size. Its dimensions give a freshness to the ink and added vibrancy, as if the orange might drip down onto an unsuspecting viewer. However, the question remains as to what Wool is exactly trying to convey. There is a certain sense of violence to the work as mentioned, despite the smoothness of his processes. The orange percolates into the support, disrupting its pristine background. Yet, there is also excitement, particularly evident in the smaller splashes, out of control pinpricks of colour. Perhaps this reflects the uncontrollable nature of Wool's practice, the untameable nature of automatic painting. Or perhaps, Glen O'Brien was more accurate in 2012 when he compared Minor Mishap to an acheiropoietic image, one created miraculously not by human hand: 'If you can see Mother Theresa's face in a raisin, then you could see an agonised Christ in this dark orange drip of silkscreen ink. You could see a lot of things'. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

John Everett Millais, 'Peace Concluded', 1856

  My eye is drawn to the copy of The Times clutched in the hands of the officer. The white of the figurine on the man's knee and the white of his wife's sleeves all serve to make the white paper stand out even more on the canvas. As the title of the painting suggests, this is about the end of the Crimean War, seemingly depicting a soldier who has just returned home, surrounded by his family, but the mood is perhaps less euphoric than you might expect. The soldier seems somber and weary, and his wife has a look of concern. Although on the surface it seems to be quite a harmonious composition representing a close knit and traditional family, the positioning of the man is odd. It is his wife who takes her place at the apex of the triangular composition, the soldier is reduced to an emasculated role, perhaps an invalid, as suggested by the blanket over his legs. Her face is passive, but not exactly positive. With her arms draped around her husband, she looks posed, dutiful but not...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ernst Barlach, 'The Avenger', 1914

  On the advent of both the First World War and the artistic movement known as Futurism, Ersnt Barlach cast this work in bronze. The eye picks out an angular, horizontal form, a sense of hurried pace and strong facial features to this work by the German Expressionist artist. This piece is highly interesting when discussed in terms of the artist's oeuvre - Barlach entered the First World War with a clear attitude of patriotism. The sculpture reflects that, as the figure seemingly thrusts forward wielding a sizeable weapon above his head, leading the charge head on. Describing the sculpture as his 'raging Barbarian' it is clear that Barlach wanted to present an emotionally charged figure. Perhaps it is even a self portrait, with Barlach picturing himself as the hero. The artist did in fact serve briefly as an infantry officer. However realisation soon dawned and patriotism quickly dwindled. All of Barlach's sculptures from this point onward are influenced by the horror an...
Post a Comment
Read more

Mark Rothko, 'Light Red over Black', 1957

  My eye is not drawn to the painting itself but the title of the painting, 'Light Red Over Black'. We would automatically think that the black is on top of a red background, but Rothko has flipped this around, subverting the title just like he subverting the meaning of what it was to be an artist and what Art actually was. During this time, art was going through rapid changes, with abstract expressionism coming into full force (Rothko, Pollock). But Rothko showed that all this change was for the good, even if for him, it was short lived.  The colour red in this painting is searing and the black struggles to fully cover this velvety border, especially at the bottom of the canvas. Unlike the black squares which have a hazy quality to their edges, the red is clear and impregnable. It is hard to figure out what this represents - the Tate has suggested a window perhaps, but if it is a window then what are we looking out into? Perhaps it is night, or perhaps the viewer is catching ...
Post a Comment
Read more