Skip to main content

Tomás Saraceno, 'How to Entangle the Universe in a Spider Web', 2017

 


Tomás Saraceno's interests in spider webs might seem uncannily odd to some viewers, however, to put aside that arachnophobia is to produce intriguing works of art. Boxed in and spectacularly spot lit, the works are confined by an omnipresent curator and the hand of Saraceno is certainly present, yet there is still room for freedom, for uniqueness. Their display in the round enables a visitor to explore for themselves. Simplistically black and white with no fuss, they are mesmeric displays, ritualistic and quietly captivating. 

Saraceno has made a name for himself through 'Arachnophilia', a community of researchers striving to know more about the spider web and its uses. However, the artist has also spoken at the Max Planck Institute in Germany, he has created his own 3D models of webs and he works across both media and scale with incredible ease - for instance, in 2022, he transformed 25,000 square feet in The Shed, New York, into a web stretched at both twelve and forty feet above ground, so that viewers entered and were literally floating in the space. Saraceno plays with the different realms of the cosmic and the real, and the photograph in question here is taken from his How to Entangle the Universe in a Spider Web exhibition from 2017 in Argentina, his place of birth, where the artist incorporated video, sound and collaborated with 7000 spiders. 

Spiders can adapt their webs to changes in climate, location and pollution. Not only are they creatures which carry mystical, spiritual symbolism associated with good fortune, death, rebirth and more, interlacing cultures together in a complex tangle of motifs and interactions, but their webs are geometrically precise, constantly changing and never the same twice. Saraceno's artworks in particular look to the scientific potentials of the spider web, illustrating the meshing together of the universe and planetary boundaries. Saraceno in fact invented a complex method to three-dimensionally scan, digitise and reconstruct spider webs. It was this interest which fuelled his developments beyond the arachnophile fascination, including his 2018 exhibition Algo-r(h)i(y)thms - monolithic, architectonic creations which recall not webs but instead, larger atomic structures. Perhaps it is the artist's background in architecture which fuels him to develop new methods of construction, and in turn, esoteric and educationally enriching works of art. Although Saraceno seems to look to the future and represent the everchanging face of contemporary art, his diversity has actually been compared to that of a 'Renaissance man' holding universal knowledge, reaching from biology to architecture, from art to astrophysics. Perhaps this is the true face of art that is slowly being revealed to us as viewers and consumers - that of interdisciplinarity. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mark Rothko, 'Light Red over Black', 1957

  My eye is not drawn to the painting itself but the title of the painting, 'Light Red Over Black'. We would automatically think that the black is on top of a red background, but Rothko has flipped this around, subverting the title just like he subverting the meaning of what it was to be an artist and what Art actually was. During this time, art was going through rapid changes, with abstract expressionism coming into full force (Rothko, Pollock). But Rothko showed that all this change was for the good, even if for him, it was short lived.  The colour red in this painting is searing and the black struggles to fully cover this velvety border, especially at the bottom of the canvas. Unlike the black squares which have a hazy quality to their edges, the red is clear and impregnable. It is hard to figure out what this represents - the Tate has suggested a window perhaps, but if it is a window then what are we looking out into? Perhaps it is night, or perhaps the viewer is catching ...

Egon Schiele, 'Dead Mother', 1910

  My eye is drawn to the hand. Those long, bony fingers are so characteristic of Schiele but here they are particularly skeletal and deathly – the veins seem to have been injected with poison. And they are a warning right in the foreground of the painting that keeps the viewer at bay as an outsider to this incredibly intimate relationship between mother and child, and sets the tone of death and mortality which hangs over the whole image. The mother cradles her child in a womb-like shroud, alluding to childbirth and the death of the mother explained in the title. She seems desperate to feel that bodily connection with her child, highlighted by the emphasis on her craned neck as she tries to connect to the baby. There is a clear link between the mother’s bent neck and the child’s bent neck, again emphasising their longing to be with each other. However, the darkness around the child is almost like ropes, with flecks of white in the painting making it look as though the darkness is wo...

Artemisia Gentileschi, 'Jael and Sisera', c.1620

  My eye firstly notices the hand wielding the hammer above the unsuspecting man's head. Gentileschi is depicting a new and particularly horrible kind of weapon here instead of the huge sword she gave Judith to slice Holofernes' head off in 1620. The tent peg seems all the more violent, especially as the viewer is looking at the split second before the deed has been committed. Moreover, the gaze of the women (Jael) is focused and calm, making the piece seem unnerving. This is not a moment of hesitation but a snapshot of action - the woman has made up her mind and will commit to this murder. The viewer can only imagine how Gentileschi would have depicted the bloody aftermath, in her usual violent and tenebristic way. The fact that the artist has signed her name in the tomb-like stone above the man is significant - she is signing his life away in this painting, sending him swiftly to the grave.  The body of the man (Sisera) is also interestingly depicted. He lies in a rather eff...