Skip to main content

Tomás Saraceno, 'How to Entangle the Universe in a Spider Web', 2017

 


Tomás Saraceno's interests in spider webs might seem uncannily odd to some viewers, however, to put aside that arachnophobia is to produce intriguing works of art. Boxed in and spectacularly spot lit, the works are confined by an omnipresent curator and the hand of Saraceno is certainly present, yet there is still room for freedom, for uniqueness. Their display in the round enables a visitor to explore for themselves. Simplistically black and white with no fuss, they are mesmeric displays, ritualistic and quietly captivating. 

Saraceno has made a name for himself through 'Arachnophilia', a community of researchers striving to know more about the spider web and its uses. However, the artist has also spoken at the Max Planck Institute in Germany, he has created his own 3D models of webs and he works across both media and scale with incredible ease - for instance, in 2022, he transformed 25,000 square feet in The Shed, New York, into a web stretched at both twelve and forty feet above ground, so that viewers entered and were literally floating in the space. Saraceno plays with the different realms of the cosmic and the real, and the photograph in question here is taken from his How to Entangle the Universe in a Spider Web exhibition from 2017 in Argentina, his place of birth, where the artist incorporated video, sound and collaborated with 7000 spiders. 

Spiders can adapt their webs to changes in climate, location and pollution. Not only are they creatures which carry mystical, spiritual symbolism associated with good fortune, death, rebirth and more, interlacing cultures together in a complex tangle of motifs and interactions, but their webs are geometrically precise, constantly changing and never the same twice. Saraceno's artworks in particular look to the scientific potentials of the spider web, illustrating the meshing together of the universe and planetary boundaries. Saraceno in fact invented a complex method to three-dimensionally scan, digitise and reconstruct spider webs. It was this interest which fuelled his developments beyond the arachnophile fascination, including his 2018 exhibition Algo-r(h)i(y)thms - monolithic, architectonic creations which recall not webs but instead, larger atomic structures. Perhaps it is the artist's background in architecture which fuels him to develop new methods of construction, and in turn, esoteric and educationally enriching works of art. Although Saraceno seems to look to the future and represent the everchanging face of contemporary art, his diversity has actually been compared to that of a 'Renaissance man' holding universal knowledge, reaching from biology to architecture, from art to astrophysics. Perhaps this is the true face of art that is slowly being revealed to us as viewers and consumers - that of interdisciplinarity. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Cellini, 'Perseus with the Head of Medusa', 1545-1554

  My eye is immediately drawn to the head of Medusa. At first glance it looks gruesome, as though Cellini has captured the moment just after the head has been decapitated, and it oozes blood and bodily matter. However the viewer then notices the similarity between that and Medusa's hair. Maybe it is just her hair after all. Cellini has cleverly enticed the viewer in here, to take a closer look and therefore involved them in the sculpture as a whole. Once they do come closer, they begin to notice other things such as the similarity between Perseus' hair and Medusa's snakes. Hero and monster are not so separate. Even the features of their faces are very similar. Perhaps Cellini wants to suggest that evil can often wear the mask of good. Or he could even be implying that everyone has some evil within them, even the hero Perseus.  One of the good things about sculpture is that the viewer is able to walk around it, and fully immerse themselves in the piece. Cellini has used this...

Artemisia Gentileschi, 'Jael and Sisera', c.1620

  My eye firstly notices the hand wielding the hammer above the unsuspecting man's head. Gentileschi is depicting a new and particularly horrible kind of weapon here instead of the huge sword she gave Judith to slice Holofernes' head off in 1620. The tent peg seems all the more violent, especially as the viewer is looking at the split second before the deed has been committed. Moreover, the gaze of the women (Jael) is focused and calm, making the piece seem unnerving. This is not a moment of hesitation but a snapshot of action - the woman has made up her mind and will commit to this murder. The viewer can only imagine how Gentileschi would have depicted the bloody aftermath, in her usual violent and tenebristic way. The fact that the artist has signed her name in the tomb-like stone above the man is significant - she is signing his life away in this painting, sending him swiftly to the grave.  The body of the man (Sisera) is also interestingly depicted. He lies in a rather eff...

John Everett Millais, 'Peace Concluded', 1856

  My eye is drawn to the copy of The Times clutched in the hands of the officer. The white of the figurine on the man's knee and the white of his wife's sleeves all serve to make the white paper stand out even more on the canvas. As the title of the painting suggests, this is about the end of the Crimean War, seemingly depicting a soldier who has just returned home, surrounded by his family, but the mood is perhaps less euphoric than you might expect. The soldier seems somber and weary, and his wife has a look of concern. Although on the surface it seems to be quite a harmonious composition representing a close knit and traditional family, the positioning of the man is odd. It is his wife who takes her place at the apex of the triangular composition, the soldier is reduced to an emasculated role, perhaps an invalid, as suggested by the blanket over his legs. Her face is passive, but not exactly positive. With her arms draped around her husband, she looks posed, dutiful but not...