Skip to main content

Anselm Kiefer, 'Myrtis', 2002

 


A collection of monolithic, monochromatic and freestanding dresses construct Anselm Kiefer's Women of Antiquity series, begun at the turn of the twenty-first century and revitalised by the artist in 2018. Exhibited most notably in his so-called 'studio' La Ribaute, these luxuriously tactile gowns have subsequently travelled across both exhibition venues and the art market. Mytris, who is weighed down by the book which constructs the head of the figure, is one such example.

Kiefer, today, is one of the most talked about artists. A slow rise to fame has now blossomed into exhibitions that have drawn on literary references (Finnegan's Wake at the White Cube in 2023), expositions detailing his earlier working life (at the Ashmolean in early 2025), or his connections to canonical artists (Van Gogh/Kiefer at the RA which recently concluded). His colossal canvases suck a viewer in, his colours are captivating, as the artist draws on themes of violence, spiritualism, desolation and human nature, ideas which clearly resonate with a modern day audience. However, the Women of Antiquity series is less typical of Kiefer - these are not 20 meter canvases and they are not overburdened with colour. As Mytris proves, colour is secondary to texture, in a dress which is conceived of clear layers. There is a heaviness to the material and its folds, almost clinging to one another in a linearity that is reminiscent of the classical 'wet look' one finds on the Parthenon frieze, for instance. In Kiefer's work, there is a clash between the modern art historical language of forceful materiality, and the classical origins of subject matter. This combines with the fact that his sculptures are designed to be viewed in the round, a particularly important feature of Renaissance and Baroque works. The coming together of history and tradition gives Kiefer's pieces a timelessness, which is perhaps why they continue to appeal.

The heavy book that flops down on the shoulders of the figure links back to the title of the work and the identifying feature as Mytris of Anthedon, likely an unknown name for today's viewer - information only comes from a short summation by the Greek philosopher Plutarch, who describes her as a poet. Allegedly, a bronze statue was made of Mytris, however, details are vague. Weighed down by her knowledge in Kiefer's portrayal, she is no femme fatale but a woman of strength who celebrates her occupation. The huge array of figures covered by the Women of Antiquity series not only suggests the impressiveness of Kiefer's own classical knowledge, but highlights the potential of art in the modern age to revitalise figures from the past that might otherwise have been lost to history. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Artemisia Gentileschi, 'Jael and Sisera', c.1620

  My eye firstly notices the hand wielding the hammer above the unsuspecting man's head. Gentileschi is depicting a new and particularly horrible kind of weapon here instead of the huge sword she gave Judith to slice Holofernes' head off in 1620. The tent peg seems all the more violent, especially as the viewer is looking at the split second before the deed has been committed. Moreover, the gaze of the women (Jael) is focused and calm, making the piece seem unnerving. This is not a moment of hesitation but a snapshot of action - the woman has made up her mind and will commit to this murder. The viewer can only imagine how Gentileschi would have depicted the bloody aftermath, in her usual violent and tenebristic way. The fact that the artist has signed her name in the tomb-like stone above the man is significant - she is signing his life away in this painting, sending him swiftly to the grave.  The body of the man (Sisera) is also interestingly depicted. He lies in a rather eff...

Cellini, 'Perseus with the Head of Medusa', 1545-1554

  My eye is immediately drawn to the head of Medusa. At first glance it looks gruesome, as though Cellini has captured the moment just after the head has been decapitated, and it oozes blood and bodily matter. However the viewer then notices the similarity between that and Medusa's hair. Maybe it is just her hair after all. Cellini has cleverly enticed the viewer in here, to take a closer look and therefore involved them in the sculpture as a whole. Once they do come closer, they begin to notice other things such as the similarity between Perseus' hair and Medusa's snakes. Hero and monster are not so separate. Even the features of their faces are very similar. Perhaps Cellini wants to suggest that evil can often wear the mask of good. Or he could even be implying that everyone has some evil within them, even the hero Perseus.  One of the good things about sculpture is that the viewer is able to walk around it, and fully immerse themselves in the piece. Cellini has used this...

John Everett Millais, 'Peace Concluded', 1856

  My eye is drawn to the copy of The Times clutched in the hands of the officer. The white of the figurine on the man's knee and the white of his wife's sleeves all serve to make the white paper stand out even more on the canvas. As the title of the painting suggests, this is about the end of the Crimean War, seemingly depicting a soldier who has just returned home, surrounded by his family, but the mood is perhaps less euphoric than you might expect. The soldier seems somber and weary, and his wife has a look of concern. Although on the surface it seems to be quite a harmonious composition representing a close knit and traditional family, the positioning of the man is odd. It is his wife who takes her place at the apex of the triangular composition, the soldier is reduced to an emasculated role, perhaps an invalid, as suggested by the blanket over his legs. Her face is passive, but not exactly positive. With her arms draped around her husband, she looks posed, dutiful but not...