Skip to main content

Joseph Wright of Derby, 'Three Persons Viewing the Gladiator by Candlelight', 1765

 



In the dimness of candlelight, Joseph Wright of Derby depicts three figures gazing intently at the Classical nude sculpture in the centre of the work. The viewer joins in this exploration, taking their own seat at the table right in front of the the leaning, contrapposto figure, which seems to be an imitation of the Borghese Gladiator. From light to dark, from flesh to marble, Derby's painting is typical of his tenebristic style, yet here he takes on a new subject that expands beyond his oeuvre of portraits, or even beyond his most well known work An Experiment on a Bird in the Air Pump.

Certainly, the work in question bears similarities to the Air Pump, particularly in the sudden explosion of light cast across the sculpture. Not only does this illuminate the musculature of the lean, stretching gladiator, but it also allows to viewer to catch a glimpse of the faces which surround the table, all of whom are individualised - in fact, the work is even said to include a portrait of the artist himself. Although the eye is immediately drawn to the central figure and his distinct red collar, the spectacled gentleman who cranes his neck on the far left is a particularly characterful depiction: his hand stretches right the way around the table in front of the viewer, as if he is pulling himself closer to the sculpture for a more useful angle of study, examining the movement and material with an intense depth of intellectualism. From these three figures, Derby also illustrates the training of artists during the eighteenth century, studying from the Classical nude, attempting to imitate the ancient artistic practices which were held up in the Enlightenment age as the pinnacle of creative achievement. Not only is this painting a celebration of Derby's abilities to handle light and dark, even amidst the limited, earthy palette, it also accurately portrays the intellectual, Academic mood of the time. 

This is a painting dominated by lines of sight: through the intensity of Derby's deep shadows, through the creation of what we can and cannot see, from what both the viewer is looking at and the learned gentlemen in the painting are viewing at the same time, and what is produced from that, modelled by the drawing on the far right of the canvas (also an example of meta painting). Only ten years before this painting, eminent art historian Johann Joachim Winckelmann had outlined the 'noble simplicity and quiet grandeur' which artists should be evoking in their depictions of the Classical past, citing the Belvedere Torso as evidence of this. In Derby's painting, he has achieved exactly that: a subtle yet powerful evocation of the ancient tradition in artistic practice, and the Enlightenment aim to imitate that in all its glory. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mark Rothko, 'Light Red over Black', 1957

  My eye is not drawn to the painting itself but the title of the painting, 'Light Red Over Black'. We would automatically think that the black is on top of a red background, but Rothko has flipped this around, subverting the title just like he subverting the meaning of what it was to be an artist and what Art actually was. During this time, art was going through rapid changes, with abstract expressionism coming into full force (Rothko, Pollock). But Rothko showed that all this change was for the good, even if for him, it was short lived.  The colour red in this painting is searing and the black struggles to fully cover this velvety border, especially at the bottom of the canvas. Unlike the black squares which have a hazy quality to their edges, the red is clear and impregnable. It is hard to figure out what this represents - the Tate has suggested a window perhaps, but if it is a window then what are we looking out into? Perhaps it is night, or perhaps the viewer is catching ...

Egon Schiele, 'Dead Mother', 1910

  My eye is drawn to the hand. Those long, bony fingers are so characteristic of Schiele but here they are particularly skeletal and deathly – the veins seem to have been injected with poison. And they are a warning right in the foreground of the painting that keeps the viewer at bay as an outsider to this incredibly intimate relationship between mother and child, and sets the tone of death and mortality which hangs over the whole image. The mother cradles her child in a womb-like shroud, alluding to childbirth and the death of the mother explained in the title. She seems desperate to feel that bodily connection with her child, highlighted by the emphasis on her craned neck as she tries to connect to the baby. There is a clear link between the mother’s bent neck and the child’s bent neck, again emphasising their longing to be with each other. However, the darkness around the child is almost like ropes, with flecks of white in the painting making it look as though the darkness is wo...

Artemisia Gentileschi, 'Jael and Sisera', c.1620

  My eye firstly notices the hand wielding the hammer above the unsuspecting man's head. Gentileschi is depicting a new and particularly horrible kind of weapon here instead of the huge sword she gave Judith to slice Holofernes' head off in 1620. The tent peg seems all the more violent, especially as the viewer is looking at the split second before the deed has been committed. Moreover, the gaze of the women (Jael) is focused and calm, making the piece seem unnerving. This is not a moment of hesitation but a snapshot of action - the woman has made up her mind and will commit to this murder. The viewer can only imagine how Gentileschi would have depicted the bloody aftermath, in her usual violent and tenebristic way. The fact that the artist has signed her name in the tomb-like stone above the man is significant - she is signing his life away in this painting, sending him swiftly to the grave.  The body of the man (Sisera) is also interestingly depicted. He lies in a rather eff...