Skip to main content

Joseph Wright of Derby, 'Three Persons Viewing the Gladiator by Candlelight', 1765

 



In the dimness of candlelight, Joseph Wright of Derby depicts three figures gazing intently at the Classical nude sculpture in the centre of the work. The viewer joins in this exploration, taking their own seat at the table right in front of the the leaning, contrapposto figure, which seems to be an imitation of the Borghese Gladiator. From light to dark, from flesh to marble, Derby's painting is typical of his tenebristic style, yet here he takes on a new subject that expands beyond his oeuvre of portraits, or even beyond his most well known work An Experiment on a Bird in the Air Pump.

Certainly, the work in question bears similarities to the Air Pump, particularly in the sudden explosion of light cast across the sculpture. Not only does this illuminate the musculature of the lean, stretching gladiator, but it also allows to viewer to catch a glimpse of the faces which surround the table, all of whom are individualised - in fact, the work is even said to include a portrait of the artist himself. Although the eye is immediately drawn to the central figure and his distinct red collar, the spectacled gentleman who cranes his neck on the far left is a particularly characterful depiction: his hand stretches right the way around the table in front of the viewer, as if he is pulling himself closer to the sculpture for a more useful angle of study, examining the movement and material with an intense depth of intellectualism. From these three figures, Derby also illustrates the training of artists during the eighteenth century, studying from the Classical nude, attempting to imitate the ancient artistic practices which were held up in the Enlightenment age as the pinnacle of creative achievement. Not only is this painting a celebration of Derby's abilities to handle light and dark, even amidst the limited, earthy palette, it also accurately portrays the intellectual, Academic mood of the time. 

This is a painting dominated by lines of sight: through the intensity of Derby's deep shadows, through the creation of what we can and cannot see, from what both the viewer is looking at and the learned gentlemen in the painting are viewing at the same time, and what is produced from that, modelled by the drawing on the far right of the canvas (also an example of meta painting). Only ten years before this painting, eminent art historian Johann Joachim Winckelmann had outlined the 'noble simplicity and quiet grandeur' which artists should be evoking in their depictions of the Classical past, citing the Belvedere Torso as evidence of this. In Derby's painting, he has achieved exactly that: a subtle yet powerful evocation of the ancient tradition in artistic practice, and the Enlightenment aim to imitate that in all its glory. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Artemisia Gentileschi, 'Jael and Sisera', c.1620

  My eye firstly notices the hand wielding the hammer above the unsuspecting man's head. Gentileschi is depicting a new and particularly horrible kind of weapon here instead of the huge sword she gave Judith to slice Holofernes' head off in 1620. The tent peg seems all the more violent, especially as the viewer is looking at the split second before the deed has been committed. Moreover, the gaze of the women (Jael) is focused and calm, making the piece seem unnerving. This is not a moment of hesitation but a snapshot of action - the woman has made up her mind and will commit to this murder. The viewer can only imagine how Gentileschi would have depicted the bloody aftermath, in her usual violent and tenebristic way. The fact that the artist has signed her name in the tomb-like stone above the man is significant - she is signing his life away in this painting, sending him swiftly to the grave.  The body of the man (Sisera) is also interestingly depicted. He lies in a rather eff...

Cellini, 'Perseus with the Head of Medusa', 1545-1554

  My eye is immediately drawn to the head of Medusa. At first glance it looks gruesome, as though Cellini has captured the moment just after the head has been decapitated, and it oozes blood and bodily matter. However the viewer then notices the similarity between that and Medusa's hair. Maybe it is just her hair after all. Cellini has cleverly enticed the viewer in here, to take a closer look and therefore involved them in the sculpture as a whole. Once they do come closer, they begin to notice other things such as the similarity between Perseus' hair and Medusa's snakes. Hero and monster are not so separate. Even the features of their faces are very similar. Perhaps Cellini wants to suggest that evil can often wear the mask of good. Or he could even be implying that everyone has some evil within them, even the hero Perseus.  One of the good things about sculpture is that the viewer is able to walk around it, and fully immerse themselves in the piece. Cellini has used this...

John Everett Millais, 'Peace Concluded', 1856

  My eye is drawn to the copy of The Times clutched in the hands of the officer. The white of the figurine on the man's knee and the white of his wife's sleeves all serve to make the white paper stand out even more on the canvas. As the title of the painting suggests, this is about the end of the Crimean War, seemingly depicting a soldier who has just returned home, surrounded by his family, but the mood is perhaps less euphoric than you might expect. The soldier seems somber and weary, and his wife has a look of concern. Although on the surface it seems to be quite a harmonious composition representing a close knit and traditional family, the positioning of the man is odd. It is his wife who takes her place at the apex of the triangular composition, the soldier is reduced to an emasculated role, perhaps an invalid, as suggested by the blanket over his legs. Her face is passive, but not exactly positive. With her arms draped around her husband, she looks posed, dutiful but not...