Skip to main content

Mark Rothko, 'Light Red over Black', 1957

 


My eye is not drawn to the painting itself but the title of the painting, 'Light Red Over Black'. We would automatically think that the black is on top of a red background, but Rothko has flipped this around, subverting the title just like he subverting the meaning of what it was to be an artist and what Art actually was. During this time, art was going through rapid changes, with abstract expressionism coming into full force (Rothko, Pollock). But Rothko showed that all this change was for the good, even if for him, it was short lived. 

The colour red in this painting is searing and the black struggles to fully cover this velvety border, especially at the bottom of the canvas. Unlike the black squares which have a hazy quality to their edges, the red is clear and impregnable. It is hard to figure out what this represents - the Tate has suggested a window perhaps, but if it is a window then what are we looking out into? Perhaps it is night, or perhaps the viewer is catching a glimpse into Rothko's mind. Rothko was depressed, and committed suicide at 66, cutting short his career. The sudden blue slashes in the black expanse could suggest a conflicting mind, thoughts trying to invade a bleak mindset. However this is abstract, it does not need to look like anything. Instead, the focus is on the colour and how somehow Rothko has managed to blend red and black into each other, even though they are such contrasting colours. This creates a sense of movement in the piece that can be fully appreciated once one stands back and takes it all in. It almost looks as though there is a source of wind that is blending the colours together with each glance the viewer takes. This links back to the Impressionist movement, where artists such as Monet and Renoir used brushstrokes and colour that make the viewer's eye do the blending for themselves. The more you look, the more that gap between the two panels of black begins to disappear. 

Nothing Rothko does seems to be finished. If you look closely, there seems to be another panel at the top of the painting that has not been filled in black like the other two 'windows'. Perhaps the artist thought about a panel here and sketched one out, before deciding he liked it better without. Or perhaps it can be linked to Rothko's state of mind again, so many swirling thoughts but also empty, like he truly was not working to his full potential. This piece was created in 1957, so he would have at least a decade more of painting to do before he ended his life. What we see in the late sixties (Untitled 1969 for instance) is the work where he could truly express himself and show who he really was. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Egon Schiele, 'Dead Mother', 1910

  My eye is drawn to the hand. Those long, bony fingers are so characteristic of Schiele but here they are particularly skeletal and deathly – the veins seem to have been injected with poison. And they are a warning right in the foreground of the painting that keeps the viewer at bay as an outsider to this incredibly intimate relationship between mother and child, and sets the tone of death and mortality which hangs over the whole image. The mother cradles her child in a womb-like shroud, alluding to childbirth and the death of the mother explained in the title. She seems desperate to feel that bodily connection with her child, highlighted by the emphasis on her craned neck as she tries to connect to the baby. There is a clear link between the mother’s bent neck and the child’s bent neck, again emphasising their longing to be with each other. However, the darkness around the child is almost like ropes, with flecks of white in the painting making it look as though the darkness is wo...
Post a Comment
Read more

Artemisia Gentileschi, 'Jael and Sisera', c.1620

  My eye firstly notices the hand wielding the hammer above the unsuspecting man's head. Gentileschi is depicting a new and particularly horrible kind of weapon here instead of the huge sword she gave Judith to slice Holofernes' head off in 1620. The tent peg seems all the more violent, especially as the viewer is looking at the split second before the deed has been committed. Moreover, the gaze of the women (Jael) is focused and calm, making the piece seem unnerving. This is not a moment of hesitation but a snapshot of action - the woman has made up her mind and will commit to this murder. The viewer can only imagine how Gentileschi would have depicted the bloody aftermath, in her usual violent and tenebristic way. The fact that the artist has signed her name in the tomb-like stone above the man is significant - she is signing his life away in this painting, sending him swiftly to the grave.  The body of the man (Sisera) is also interestingly depicted. He lies in a rather eff...
Post a Comment
Read more