Skip to main content

Stubbs, 'Horse Attacked by Lion', 1762

 A Lion Attacking a Horse | Yale Center For British Art

My eye is drawn to the eye of the horse. Stubbs has humanised the animal, creating an expression of desperate terror with the white of his eye emphasised by the white diamond in the forehead and the deep shadow between. He has also positioned the horse and lion’s heads locked together, making a direct comparison between their teeth, but also their eyes: the lion looks up almost impassively, as if what is a matter of life or death for the horse is of little consequence to him. In fact, Stubbs himself actually witnessed a horse being attacked by a lion during his visit to Africa, and this haunted him and the subsequent paintings he created. The drama and raw brutality are very different from the majority of his other images of horses.

If it was not for the background perspective in the painting, it would seem like a very two-dimensional picture. There is no foreshortening and the horse and lion are depicted in a very flat manner, almost like a relief frieze, which brings them very close to the viewer and concentrates the movement inwards, suggesting there is no escape. However Stubbs incorporates nature into the painting too, to create dimension to the work. The painting recedes from the horse and lion, into the middle ground represented by the first trees and finally the background shown by the lone tree to the right of the canvas, and the suggested landscape beyond.

Stubbs has drawn on Romantic themes and depicted the power of animals and the natural world – the horse seems to be beginning to buckle and fall under the weight of the lion, the veins on its hind legs bulging and straining as the adrenaline pumps through the body. You get the sense of its great power through its muscular neck and body, even though you sense the futility. The lion’s grip on the horse in painting seems firm, almost wrapped around the horse entirely.

The dramatic Romanticism is also felt in the way Stubbs depicts movement. There seems to be some sort of wind that perhaps the viewer will only really feel if they step into the painting. This is shown by the way the horse’s mane is flying out to the side, whilst in the background, it also looks like the trees are being blown and perhaps even a storm is brewing, hence the dark clouds which every time you take another glance at the painting seem to be moving further and further over the pocket of blue sky. The colours used also link to this, with the whole painting having quite a dark feel to it, apart from the horse. Perhaps, through the use of light and shade on the horse, the artist is trying to evoke some sympathy for the horse as it is taking down by the enemy that is the lion in the painting, which is shrouded in darkness. It is tempting to see some kind of symbolism with the more elegant, civilised animal being attacked by the wild beast. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Cellini, 'Perseus with the Head of Medusa', 1545-1554

  My eye is immediately drawn to the head of Medusa. At first glance it looks gruesome, as though Cellini has captured the moment just after the head has been decapitated, and it oozes blood and bodily matter. However the viewer then notices the similarity between that and Medusa's hair. Maybe it is just her hair after all. Cellini has cleverly enticed the viewer in here, to take a closer look and therefore involved them in the sculpture as a whole. Once they do come closer, they begin to notice other things such as the similarity between Perseus' hair and Medusa's snakes. Hero and monster are not so separate. Even the features of their faces are very similar. Perhaps Cellini wants to suggest that evil can often wear the mask of good. Or he could even be implying that everyone has some evil within them, even the hero Perseus.  One of the good things about sculpture is that the viewer is able to walk around it, and fully immerse themselves in the piece. Cellini has used this...

Guccio di Mannaia, 'Chalice for Pope Nicholas IV', 13th century

  As the only work remaining of Sienese goldsmith Guccio di Mannaia, the chalice he created for Pope Nicholas IV in the late thirteenth century is an incredibly important work of art. Not only does it highlight the rich, opulent nature of papal commissions, but it proves the talent of Sienese goldsmiths and their resulting influence on painters and sculptors of the period. The chalice is innovative in shape and form, but it is striking first and foremost through the use of gold. It is an object that deserves to be viewed in the flesh, because of its reflective and therefore mimetic potential – like a bronze sculpture it is activated by light and should be experienced in the round as a three-dimensional, highly decorated art object. Its complicated design features an almost architectonic base, star-like as it spills out towards the viewer. The base builds up into the stem of the chalice which is decorated with an array of enamelled plaques featuring saints, prophets, angels and furt...

Artemisia Gentileschi, 'Jael and Sisera', c.1620

  My eye firstly notices the hand wielding the hammer above the unsuspecting man's head. Gentileschi is depicting a new and particularly horrible kind of weapon here instead of the huge sword she gave Judith to slice Holofernes' head off in 1620. The tent peg seems all the more violent, especially as the viewer is looking at the split second before the deed has been committed. Moreover, the gaze of the women (Jael) is focused and calm, making the piece seem unnerving. This is not a moment of hesitation but a snapshot of action - the woman has made up her mind and will commit to this murder. The viewer can only imagine how Gentileschi would have depicted the bloody aftermath, in her usual violent and tenebristic way. The fact that the artist has signed her name in the tomb-like stone above the man is significant - she is signing his life away in this painting, sending him swiftly to the grave.  The body of the man (Sisera) is also interestingly depicted. He lies in a rather eff...