Skip to main content

Stubbs, 'Horse Attacked by Lion', 1762

 A Lion Attacking a Horse | Yale Center For British Art

My eye is drawn to the eye of the horse. Stubbs has humanised the animal, creating an expression of desperate terror with the white of his eye emphasised by the white diamond in the forehead and the deep shadow between. He has also positioned the horse and lion’s heads locked together, making a direct comparison between their teeth, but also their eyes: the lion looks up almost impassively, as if what is a matter of life or death for the horse is of little consequence to him. In fact, Stubbs himself actually witnessed a horse being attacked by a lion during his visit to Africa, and this haunted him and the subsequent paintings he created. The drama and raw brutality are very different from the majority of his other images of horses.

If it was not for the background perspective in the painting, it would seem like a very two-dimensional picture. There is no foreshortening and the horse and lion are depicted in a very flat manner, almost like a relief frieze, which brings them very close to the viewer and concentrates the movement inwards, suggesting there is no escape. However Stubbs incorporates nature into the painting too, to create dimension to the work. The painting recedes from the horse and lion, into the middle ground represented by the first trees and finally the background shown by the lone tree to the right of the canvas, and the suggested landscape beyond.

Stubbs has drawn on Romantic themes and depicted the power of animals and the natural world – the horse seems to be beginning to buckle and fall under the weight of the lion, the veins on its hind legs bulging and straining as the adrenaline pumps through the body. You get the sense of its great power through its muscular neck and body, even though you sense the futility. The lion’s grip on the horse in painting seems firm, almost wrapped around the horse entirely.

The dramatic Romanticism is also felt in the way Stubbs depicts movement. There seems to be some sort of wind that perhaps the viewer will only really feel if they step into the painting. This is shown by the way the horse’s mane is flying out to the side, whilst in the background, it also looks like the trees are being blown and perhaps even a storm is brewing, hence the dark clouds which every time you take another glance at the painting seem to be moving further and further over the pocket of blue sky. The colours used also link to this, with the whole painting having quite a dark feel to it, apart from the horse. Perhaps, through the use of light and shade on the horse, the artist is trying to evoke some sympathy for the horse as it is taking down by the enemy that is the lion in the painting, which is shrouded in darkness. It is tempting to see some kind of symbolism with the more elegant, civilised animal being attacked by the wild beast. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

John Everett Millais, 'Peace Concluded', 1856

  My eye is drawn to the copy of The Times clutched in the hands of the officer. The white of the figurine on the man's knee and the white of his wife's sleeves all serve to make the white paper stand out even more on the canvas. As the title of the painting suggests, this is about the end of the Crimean War, seemingly depicting a soldier who has just returned home, surrounded by his family, but the mood is perhaps less euphoric than you might expect. The soldier seems somber and weary, and his wife has a look of concern. Although on the surface it seems to be quite a harmonious composition representing a close knit and traditional family, the positioning of the man is odd. It is his wife who takes her place at the apex of the triangular composition, the soldier is reduced to an emasculated role, perhaps an invalid, as suggested by the blanket over his legs. Her face is passive, but not exactly positive. With her arms draped around her husband, she looks posed, dutiful but not...

Ernst Barlach, 'The Avenger', 1914

  On the advent of both the First World War and the artistic movement known as Futurism, Ersnt Barlach cast this work in bronze. The eye picks out an angular, horizontal form, a sense of hurried pace and strong facial features to this work by the German Expressionist artist. This piece is highly interesting when discussed in terms of the artist's oeuvre - Barlach entered the First World War with a clear attitude of patriotism. The sculpture reflects that, as the figure seemingly thrusts forward wielding a sizeable weapon above his head, leading the charge head on. Describing the sculpture as his 'raging Barbarian' it is clear that Barlach wanted to present an emotionally charged figure. Perhaps it is even a self portrait, with Barlach picturing himself as the hero. The artist did in fact serve briefly as an infantry officer. However realisation soon dawned and patriotism quickly dwindled. All of Barlach's sculptures from this point onward are influenced by the horror an...

Egon Schiele, 'Dead Mother', 1910

  My eye is drawn to the hand. Those long, bony fingers are so characteristic of Schiele but here they are particularly skeletal and deathly – the veins seem to have been injected with poison. And they are a warning right in the foreground of the painting that keeps the viewer at bay as an outsider to this incredibly intimate relationship between mother and child, and sets the tone of death and mortality which hangs over the whole image. The mother cradles her child in a womb-like shroud, alluding to childbirth and the death of the mother explained in the title. She seems desperate to feel that bodily connection with her child, highlighted by the emphasis on her craned neck as she tries to connect to the baby. There is a clear link between the mother’s bent neck and the child’s bent neck, again emphasising their longing to be with each other. However, the darkness around the child is almost like ropes, with flecks of white in the painting making it look as though the darkness is wo...