Skip to main content

Stubbs, 'Horse Attacked by Lion', 1762

 A Lion Attacking a Horse | Yale Center For British Art

My eye is drawn to the eye of the horse. Stubbs has humanised the animal, creating an expression of desperate terror with the white of his eye emphasised by the white diamond in the forehead and the deep shadow between. He has also positioned the horse and lion’s heads locked together, making a direct comparison between their teeth, but also their eyes: the lion looks up almost impassively, as if what is a matter of life or death for the horse is of little consequence to him. In fact, Stubbs himself actually witnessed a horse being attacked by a lion during his visit to Africa, and this haunted him and the subsequent paintings he created. The drama and raw brutality are very different from the majority of his other images of horses.

If it was not for the background perspective in the painting, it would seem like a very two-dimensional picture. There is no foreshortening and the horse and lion are depicted in a very flat manner, almost like a relief frieze, which brings them very close to the viewer and concentrates the movement inwards, suggesting there is no escape. However Stubbs incorporates nature into the painting too, to create dimension to the work. The painting recedes from the horse and lion, into the middle ground represented by the first trees and finally the background shown by the lone tree to the right of the canvas, and the suggested landscape beyond.

Stubbs has drawn on Romantic themes and depicted the power of animals and the natural world – the horse seems to be beginning to buckle and fall under the weight of the lion, the veins on its hind legs bulging and straining as the adrenaline pumps through the body. You get the sense of its great power through its muscular neck and body, even though you sense the futility. The lion’s grip on the horse in painting seems firm, almost wrapped around the horse entirely.

The dramatic Romanticism is also felt in the way Stubbs depicts movement. There seems to be some sort of wind that perhaps the viewer will only really feel if they step into the painting. This is shown by the way the horse’s mane is flying out to the side, whilst in the background, it also looks like the trees are being blown and perhaps even a storm is brewing, hence the dark clouds which every time you take another glance at the painting seem to be moving further and further over the pocket of blue sky. The colours used also link to this, with the whole painting having quite a dark feel to it, apart from the horse. Perhaps, through the use of light and shade on the horse, the artist is trying to evoke some sympathy for the horse as it is taking down by the enemy that is the lion in the painting, which is shrouded in darkness. It is tempting to see some kind of symbolism with the more elegant, civilised animal being attacked by the wild beast. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Nicola Pisano, 'Adoration of the Magi', Pisa Baptistery Pulpit Panel

  In this complex, lively, exciting pulpit panel the eye looks up towards the monumentality of the Virgin, who commands this scene. She is massive and powerful, the largest figure with thick swathes of drapery delineating her forcefully protruding knees out into the viewer's space. Seated but still retaining dominance, she defines the classicising style of Nicola Pisano, witnessed throughout the panels of his pulpit in Pisa. Many writers have described the style - Eloise Angiola for instance, refers to the 'sophisticated understanding of classical prototypes to create heroic human forms' in Nicola's pulpit. Certainly in Pisa the prominent debris from the classical past remained visible and Nicola easily had access to various ancient sarcophagi for direct emulation here. The Virgin's features with her serene expression and curled hair beneath the mantle are in fact quite androgenous. She quickly assumes the position of a monumental Roman Emperor or Senator commanding

Marianne von Werekin, 'Sunrise', 1920

  An endless line of men that tug the rope of a small boat soon disappear into murky, burning red waters beyond. Colour is fantastical, mystical and otherworldly, producing an atmosphere far from reality. This is the Symbolist work of Marianne von Werefkin, part of the German Expressionists that worked in Munich from the 1910s. A movement so often dominated by the male names of the time – Kandinsky especially – Werefkin was a vital participant, expanding the range of art produced and displayed, complementing her work with art theory and written sources, as well as creating her own Salon upon her arrival in Munich. It is easy to get lost in biography with a piece such as this. Wasted, human potential seems to be at the heart of this work, signalled by the endless line of men pushing forward towards the edge of the picture plane. There is a sense of struggle and a universality to the suffering through the portrayal of faceless men in similar blue tones. Looking at the date produced of 19

Mark Rothko, 'Light Red over Black', 1957

  My eye is not drawn to the painting itself but the title of the painting, 'Light Red Over Black'. We would automatically think that the black is on top of a red background, but Rothko has flipped this around, subverting the title just like he subverting the meaning of what it was to be an artist and what Art actually was. During this time, art was going through rapid changes, with abstract expressionism coming into full force (Rothko, Pollock). But Rothko showed that all this change was for the good, even if for him, it was short lived.  The colour red in this painting is searing and the black struggles to fully cover this velvety border, especially at the bottom of the canvas. Unlike the black squares which have a hazy quality to their edges, the red is clear and impregnable. It is hard to figure out what this represents - the Tate has suggested a window perhaps, but if it is a window then what are we looking out into? Perhaps it is night, or perhaps the viewer is catching a