Skip to main content

Claude Lorrain, 'Ascanius Shooting the Stag of Sylvia', 1682

 


Claude's seemingly idyllic, archaic landscapes are made to attract the eye, and lure the viewer into the world of the antique past. From the sixteenth century onwards, a taste for the antique pervaded art across genre and space. The landscape paintings that Claude seemingly mass produced during his lifetime are no exception, occupying the genre of history painting with the addition of figures, mythological and classical subject matter. This was Claude's last landscape, depicting a Virgilian subject with over-elongated figures on the left, buried within the foliage of this stage-like composition. Scholars are uncertain as to whether the piece is indeed finished, but it is inscribed with the date and subject matter, which implies completion. 

Looking closer however, this is not simply an idyllic landscape as many of Claude's paintings appear to be on the surface. The classical temple with its fluted Corinthian columns is falling into ruin, crumbling out of the picture frame, implying the extension of the landscape beyond what the viewer takes in here. There is a hint of nostalgia, a longing for the classical past that so many artists evoked during this period. But there is also distance - the classical past can never be recreated in all its magnificence and beauty. Beyond the collapsing temple, the trees bending inwards seem equally broken, sagging as if tired of standing tall for so many years. They are painted with a light and delicate touch, adding to their ephemeral, weakening nature. But they also serve to draw the eye towards the sky, thick with threatening clouds, unusually dark in tonal qualities for Claude's landscapes. A storm is brewing, as the dreamy lighting of Claude's past landscapes disappear behind the mountain looming in the distance. 

Claude has used this landscape to evoke the story from Virgil. By inscribing the name of the painting, he wants the viewer to make the connection between literature and art. From Virgil's Aeneid, a stag is kept as a pet by the sons of Tyrrhus and their sister Sylvia, able to roam the woods safely. However here an elongated figure can be seen raising their bow and shooting the stag, which looks back in sudden alarm. The scene actually prefigures the war brought to Latium and the prolonged struggle for the future site of Rome. Instead of being a peaceful landscape, there is a somber moment of silence that surrounds the painting as the figure knocks an arrow to his bow and prepares to fire at the sacred animal. This is not just about the skill of Claude as a landscape painter, but also his ability to infuse and weave meaning into that recognisable style. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mark Rothko, 'Light Red over Black', 1957

  My eye is not drawn to the painting itself but the title of the painting, 'Light Red Over Black'. We would automatically think that the black is on top of a red background, but Rothko has flipped this around, subverting the title just like he subverting the meaning of what it was to be an artist and what Art actually was. During this time, art was going through rapid changes, with abstract expressionism coming into full force (Rothko, Pollock). But Rothko showed that all this change was for the good, even if for him, it was short lived.  The colour red in this painting is searing and the black struggles to fully cover this velvety border, especially at the bottom of the canvas. Unlike the black squares which have a hazy quality to their edges, the red is clear and impregnable. It is hard to figure out what this represents - the Tate has suggested a window perhaps, but if it is a window then what are we looking out into? Perhaps it is night, or perhaps the viewer is catching ...

Artemisia Gentileschi, 'Jael and Sisera', c.1620

  My eye firstly notices the hand wielding the hammer above the unsuspecting man's head. Gentileschi is depicting a new and particularly horrible kind of weapon here instead of the huge sword she gave Judith to slice Holofernes' head off in 1620. The tent peg seems all the more violent, especially as the viewer is looking at the split second before the deed has been committed. Moreover, the gaze of the women (Jael) is focused and calm, making the piece seem unnerving. This is not a moment of hesitation but a snapshot of action - the woman has made up her mind and will commit to this murder. The viewer can only imagine how Gentileschi would have depicted the bloody aftermath, in her usual violent and tenebristic way. The fact that the artist has signed her name in the tomb-like stone above the man is significant - she is signing his life away in this painting, sending him swiftly to the grave.  The body of the man (Sisera) is also interestingly depicted. He lies in a rather eff...

Egon Schiele, 'Dead Mother', 1910

  My eye is drawn to the hand. Those long, bony fingers are so characteristic of Schiele but here they are particularly skeletal and deathly – the veins seem to have been injected with poison. And they are a warning right in the foreground of the painting that keeps the viewer at bay as an outsider to this incredibly intimate relationship between mother and child, and sets the tone of death and mortality which hangs over the whole image. The mother cradles her child in a womb-like shroud, alluding to childbirth and the death of the mother explained in the title. She seems desperate to feel that bodily connection with her child, highlighted by the emphasis on her craned neck as she tries to connect to the baby. There is a clear link between the mother’s bent neck and the child’s bent neck, again emphasising their longing to be with each other. However, the darkness around the child is almost like ropes, with flecks of white in the painting making it look as though the darkness is wo...