Skip to main content

Refik Anadol, 'Unsupervised', 2022

 


In a world where AI-generated art is 'burgeoning' according to Gareth Harris, the eye will increasingly witness these immersive, evolving, self-generating images that now percolate museums. Refik Anadol at MoMA in 2022-3 was no exception, a huge installation that was full of movement and change. Transforming the meta-data of the gallery of over two-hundred years of art, and creating a digital work inspired by his findings, Anadol's installation was designed to envelop the viewer walking into and through it as if consumed by it, or in the words of MoMA, a display that was truly 'visionary'. 

Anadol is just one artist collaborating with the machine to produce this generative art that could be our future. The fact that this was a popular exhibition at MoMA perhaps belies a growing institutional awareness and acceptance of these new methods. Certainly it seems to be the case elsewhere - the first 'original' work constructed through AI to come to auction was at Christie's in 2018, the Portrait of Edmond de Belamy which sold for an incredible $432,500. This has a dual implication - both institutional acceptance and market acceptance, which is key to the growth of any art form. This portrait was created from GAN algorithms by a Paris-based collective, so it is an example of a group of artists working with a machine to produce a lucrative product. The role of the human is currently crucial in AI-art - they design the algorithm and the machine steadily 'learns' (rather like a human would) to eventually create its images. Equally Anadol believes that the human is inseparable from his work and is very attached to the idea of 'human memory' in his creations. Unsupervised suggests this, as it is using the collection of MoMA, created by humans, as the base for developing the installation. Anadol's other work is in a similar vein and often relates to humanity's contact with nature, swiftly becoming a memory due to the impacts of climate change. Anadol's Coral Dreams was his version of creating artificial realities to preserve disappearing nature, and is very like Unsupervised in its swirling, ever-changing patterns on a wide screen for a viewer to immerse themselves within. 

Literature just about tolerates the growth of the digital in the realm of art history and the aesthetic. Particularly in the West however, the 'fear of the machine' has been a constant, and has impacted our viewing of art in the past. Artists in nineteenth century Britain desperately retaliated against the machine and returned to the past or traditional methods of production by hand in the Arts and Crafts Movement. Equally the rise of photography threatened the traditional modes of artistic production and painting had to expand to survive, breaking away from the strictly pictorial and into the realm of the abstract. The fact that photography has only relatively recently been accepted institutionally as an art form attests to this long term scepticism surrounding the machine. Now with the growth of digital humanities, the ever maturing algorithm and the production of AI-generated art, the traditional methods of artistic production are being called into question again. Will they once more adapt to survive? Or perhaps our 'period eye' will instead adapt to a mechanical, machine age that accepts non-human art on a level playing field, or even as capable of producing 'better' art, whatever that may mean. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Artemisia Gentileschi, 'Jael and Sisera', c.1620

  My eye firstly notices the hand wielding the hammer above the unsuspecting man's head. Gentileschi is depicting a new and particularly horrible kind of weapon here instead of the huge sword she gave Judith to slice Holofernes' head off in 1620. The tent peg seems all the more violent, especially as the viewer is looking at the split second before the deed has been committed. Moreover, the gaze of the women (Jael) is focused and calm, making the piece seem unnerving. This is not a moment of hesitation but a snapshot of action - the woman has made up her mind and will commit to this murder. The viewer can only imagine how Gentileschi would have depicted the bloody aftermath, in her usual violent and tenebristic way. The fact that the artist has signed her name in the tomb-like stone above the man is significant - she is signing his life away in this painting, sending him swiftly to the grave.  The body of the man (Sisera) is also interestingly depicted. He lies in a rather eff...
Post a Comment
Read more

John Everett Millais, 'Peace Concluded', 1856

  My eye is drawn to the copy of The Times clutched in the hands of the officer. The white of the figurine on the man's knee and the white of his wife's sleeves all serve to make the white paper stand out even more on the canvas. As the title of the painting suggests, this is about the end of the Crimean War, seemingly depicting a soldier who has just returned home, surrounded by his family, but the mood is perhaps less euphoric than you might expect. The soldier seems somber and weary, and his wife has a look of concern. Although on the surface it seems to be quite a harmonious composition representing a close knit and traditional family, the positioning of the man is odd. It is his wife who takes her place at the apex of the triangular composition, the soldier is reduced to an emasculated role, perhaps an invalid, as suggested by the blanket over his legs. Her face is passive, but not exactly positive. With her arms draped around her husband, she looks posed, dutiful but not...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ernst Barlach, 'The Avenger', 1914

  On the advent of both the First World War and the artistic movement known as Futurism, Ersnt Barlach cast this work in bronze. The eye picks out an angular, horizontal form, a sense of hurried pace and strong facial features to this work by the German Expressionist artist. This piece is highly interesting when discussed in terms of the artist's oeuvre - Barlach entered the First World War with a clear attitude of patriotism. The sculpture reflects that, as the figure seemingly thrusts forward wielding a sizeable weapon above his head, leading the charge head on. Describing the sculpture as his 'raging Barbarian' it is clear that Barlach wanted to present an emotionally charged figure. Perhaps it is even a self portrait, with Barlach picturing himself as the hero. The artist did in fact serve briefly as an infantry officer. However realisation soon dawned and patriotism quickly dwindled. All of Barlach's sculptures from this point onward are influenced by the horror an...
Post a Comment
Read more