Skip to main content

Mary Linwood, 'Salvator Mundi', 1798

 


In her embroidery from the late eighteenth century, Mary Linwood depicts Christ holding a chalice before him, and a piece of bread delicately in his hand, presumably seated at the Last Supper. Blessing with the other hand, he looks up towards the heavens with heavy, knowing eyes, perhaps in one final act of guidance and comfort. Although Linwood copies the oil painting of Carlo Dolci, in terms of media and materials, alongside specificities of subject matter, this becomes a unique rendering of a Salvator Mundi - whilst there is a particular combination of craft and religiosity, the attention to technique through textile remains unrivalled in this genre of Christian imagery. 

The work is named Salvator Mundi, but it is unconventional in terms of its presentation of Christ: usually, paintings with this title depict the Redeemer blessing and holding an orb or globe, in reference to Medieval royal regalia, which of course, is still used in coronation ceremonies today. In the hand of Christ, the orb combines the power of the monarch (earthly) with the divine power of now being connected to God (heavenly), and perhaps this iconography reached its fullest potential in fifteenth century Netherlandish art, including by Hans Memling. However, Dolci, and Linwood copying his painting, chose to put elements of the Last Supper into the foreground of the work - the chalice is particularly interesting, and seems to reference early Renaissance types found in, for instance, the workshops of Sienese goldsmiths such as Guccio di Mannaio, perhaps suggesting that Dolci had access to such objects when constructing his painting.

Meanwhile, the bread, plate and napkin add elements of realism to the piece, especially in the white napkin which is neatly collected by Christ's right arm, its folds delicately contrasting the heavier draperies which the protagonist of the work wears. Christ is also depicted in the more usual Salvator Mundi dress of red and blue draperies, which again represents his occupation of earthly and divine realms. The revealing of the red underneath in a V-shape gently complements the pointed chin of Christ and his elongated facial features, almost Byzantine in construction. It is Linwood's foreground additions, however, which truly allow her to flex the creative potential of craft, presenting the napkin, chalice and bread with striking realism, each individual, colourful thread contributing to the overall whole. The softness of colour choices and use of gold and yellow thread which are most noticeable in the stem of the chalice, complements the hair of Christ alongside his glowing, golden halo. Despite being a copy of Dolci's Salvator Mundi, Linwood has made a definite move away from the original, and that is primarily achieved through technique, craft and the use of intriguing materials. 



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mark Rothko, 'Light Red over Black', 1957

  My eye is not drawn to the painting itself but the title of the painting, 'Light Red Over Black'. We would automatically think that the black is on top of a red background, but Rothko has flipped this around, subverting the title just like he subverting the meaning of what it was to be an artist and what Art actually was. During this time, art was going through rapid changes, with abstract expressionism coming into full force (Rothko, Pollock). But Rothko showed that all this change was for the good, even if for him, it was short lived.  The colour red in this painting is searing and the black struggles to fully cover this velvety border, especially at the bottom of the canvas. Unlike the black squares which have a hazy quality to their edges, the red is clear and impregnable. It is hard to figure out what this represents - the Tate has suggested a window perhaps, but if it is a window then what are we looking out into? Perhaps it is night, or perhaps the viewer is catching ...

Egon Schiele, 'Dead Mother', 1910

  My eye is drawn to the hand. Those long, bony fingers are so characteristic of Schiele but here they are particularly skeletal and deathly – the veins seem to have been injected with poison. And they are a warning right in the foreground of the painting that keeps the viewer at bay as an outsider to this incredibly intimate relationship between mother and child, and sets the tone of death and mortality which hangs over the whole image. The mother cradles her child in a womb-like shroud, alluding to childbirth and the death of the mother explained in the title. She seems desperate to feel that bodily connection with her child, highlighted by the emphasis on her craned neck as she tries to connect to the baby. There is a clear link between the mother’s bent neck and the child’s bent neck, again emphasising their longing to be with each other. However, the darkness around the child is almost like ropes, with flecks of white in the painting making it look as though the darkness is wo...

Artemisia Gentileschi, 'Jael and Sisera', c.1620

  My eye firstly notices the hand wielding the hammer above the unsuspecting man's head. Gentileschi is depicting a new and particularly horrible kind of weapon here instead of the huge sword she gave Judith to slice Holofernes' head off in 1620. The tent peg seems all the more violent, especially as the viewer is looking at the split second before the deed has been committed. Moreover, the gaze of the women (Jael) is focused and calm, making the piece seem unnerving. This is not a moment of hesitation but a snapshot of action - the woman has made up her mind and will commit to this murder. The viewer can only imagine how Gentileschi would have depicted the bloody aftermath, in her usual violent and tenebristic way. The fact that the artist has signed her name in the tomb-like stone above the man is significant - she is signing his life away in this painting, sending him swiftly to the grave.  The body of the man (Sisera) is also interestingly depicted. He lies in a rather eff...